PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTRN vs. SOEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTRN vs. SOEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTRN achieves a -9.79% return, which is significantly higher than SOEZ's -43.08% return.


BTRN

1D
-0.75%
1M
-7.85%
YTD
-9.79%
6M
-9.74%
1Y
-15.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SOEZ

1D
-5.25%
1M
-18.15%
YTD
-43.08%
6M
-43.22%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTRN vs. SOEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BTRN
Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF
-9.79%-0.68%
SOEZ
Franklin Solana ETF
-43.08%-11.69%

Correlation

The correlation between BTRN and SOEZ is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTRN vs. SOEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTRN
BTRN Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BTRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTRN Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTRN Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

SOEZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTRN vs. SOEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BTRNSOEZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.99

BTRN vs. SOEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BTRN vs. SOEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTRN drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum SOEZ drawdown of -56.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTRN and SOEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTRNSOEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.97%

-56.14%

+19.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.71%

-52.17%

+26.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.64%

-32.60%

+17.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.73%

Volatility

BTRN vs. SOEZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTRNSOEZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.59%

70.83%

-52.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.61%

70.83%

-40.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.61%

70.83%

-40.22%

BTRN vs. SOEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTRN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SOEZ's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTRN vs. SOEZ - Dividend Comparison

BTRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.77%, more than SOEZ's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BTRN
Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF
30.77%27.76%2.56%
SOEZ
Franklin Solana ETF
0.96%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTRN and SOEZ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SOEZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SOEZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTRN.

BTRN has the higher dividend yield at 30.77%, compared with 0.96% for SOEZ.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BTRN and 0.19% for SOEZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTRN and SOEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer