PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTRN vs. ETHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTRN vs. ETHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) and ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTRN achieves a -10.56% return, which is significantly lower than ETHD's 47.92% return.


BTRN

1D
-0.73%
1M
-1.54%
6M
-10.80%
YTD
-10.56%
1Y
-25.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ETHD

1D
1.79%
1M
-18.28%
6M
63.00%
YTD
47.92%
1Y
-22.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTRN vs. ETHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BTRN
Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF
-10.56%4.89%11.84%
ETHD
ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF
47.92%-72.49%-38.58%

Correlation

The correlation between BTRN and ETHD is -0.56, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2024

-0.59

The correlation between BTRN and ETHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.59 to -0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTRN vs. ETHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTRN
BTRN Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
BTRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTRN Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
BTRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTRN Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

ETHD
ETHD Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
ETHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHD Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHD Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTRN vs. ETHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) and ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BTRNETHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.73

1.09

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

-0.32

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.50

-0.49

-1.01

BTRN vs. ETHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTRN Sharpe Ratio is -1.44, which is lower than the ETHD Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTRN and ETHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BTRN vs. ETHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTRN drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum ETHD drawdown of -95.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTRN and ETHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTRNETHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.97%

-95.59%

+58.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.45%

-70.58%

+44.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.34%

-88.44%

+62.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.90%

-66.91%

+52.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.83%

46.38%

-29.55%

Volatility

BTRN vs. ETHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) is 1.74%, while ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) has a volatility of 33.82%. This indicates that BTRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTRNETHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.74%

33.82%

-32.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.25%

93.61%

-83.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.60%

135.96%

-118.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.28%

141.58%

-111.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.28%

141.58%

-111.30%

BTRN vs. ETHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTRN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHD's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTRN vs. ETHD - Dividend Comparison

BTRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.39%, more than ETHD's 5.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BTRN
Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF
31.39%27.76%2.56%
ETHD
ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF
5.03%156.62%19.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTRN and ETHD have a correlation of -0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETHD has higher volatility (33.82%) compared to BTRN (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTRN dropped -36.97% vs ETHD's -95.59%.

On 1-year performance, ETHD leads with -22.78% vs -25.19% for BTRN. On fees, BTRN is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BTRN has been the lower-risk option at 1.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ETHD has performed better with a -22.78% return vs -25.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BTRN is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for ETHD.

BTRN has the higher dividend yield at 31.39%, compared with 5.03% for ETHD.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BTRN and 1.01% for ETHD.

ETHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTRN and ETHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer