BTRN vs. BCCC
BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) and BCCC (Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Global X. BTRN is passively managed, while BCCC is actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BTRN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BCCC.
Performance
BTRN vs. BCCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTRN achieves a -9.29% return, which is significantly higher than BCCC's -21.49% return.
BTRN
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -12.31%
- YTD
- -9.29%
- 6M
- -9.90%
- 1Y
- -18.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCCC
- 1D
- -2.78%
- 1M
- -14.90%
- YTD
- -21.49%
- 6M
- -22.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTRN vs. BCCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | -9.29% | -8.90% |
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -21.49% | -7.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTRN and BCCC is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTRN vs. BCCC — Risk / Return Rank
BTRN
BCCC
BTRN vs. BCCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) and Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTRN | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTRN | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | -0.78 | +0.78 |
Drawdowns
BTRN vs. BCCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTRN drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum BCCC drawdown of -41.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTRN and BCCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTRN | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -41.62% | +4.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.29% | -37.25% | +11.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.41% | -16.84% | +2.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.68% | — | — |
Volatility
BTRN vs. BCCC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTRN | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.91% | 35.07% | -15.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.96% | 35.07% | -4.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.96% | 35.07% | -4.11% |
BTRN vs. BCCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTRN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BCCC's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTRN vs. BCCC - Dividend Comparison
BTRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.60%, less than BCCC's 62.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 62.51% | 29.55% | 0.00% |
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | 30.60% | 27.76% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTRN and BCCC have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCCC is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCCC is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTRN.
BCCC has the higher dividend yield at 62.51%, compared with 30.60% for BTRN.
Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BTRN and 0.75% for BCCC.
Find the right allocation for BTRN and BCCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer