BTCI vs. RLTY
BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) is Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos, while RLTY (Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund) is a stock. Over the past year, BTCI returned -34.62% vs 11.76% for RLTY. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BTCI vs. RLTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCI achieves a -25.54% return, which is significantly lower than RLTY's 9.57% return.
BTCI
- 1D
- -2.32%
- 1M
- -16.42%
- YTD
- -25.54%
- 6M
- -25.93%
- 1Y
- -34.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RLTY
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 9.57%
- 6M
- 11.78%
- 1Y
- 11.76%
- 3Y*
- 14.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCI vs. RLTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | -25.54% | -1.09% | 26.12% |
RLTY Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund | 9.57% | 8.56% | -13.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCI and RLTY is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCI vs. RLTY — Risk / Return Rank
BTCI
RLTY
BTCI vs. RLTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTCI | RLTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.16 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 1.05 | -1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 3.48 | -4.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTCI vs. RLTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCI drawdown since its inception was -47.16%, which is greater than RLTY's maximum drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCI and RLTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCI | RLTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.16% | -35.44% | -11.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.16% | -11.40% | -35.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.94% | -1.97% | -42.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.92% | -13.62% | -2.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.71% | 3.43% | +23.28% |
Volatility
BTCI vs. RLTY - Volatility Comparison
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a higher volatility of 12.11% compared to Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) at 3.99%. This indicates that BTCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCI | RLTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.11% | 3.99% | +8.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.18% | 10.30% | +20.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.53% | 13.32% | +26.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.31% | 22.67% | +17.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.31% | 22.67% | +17.64% |
Dividends
BTCI vs. RLTY - Dividend Comparison
BTCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.02%, more than RLTY's 8.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | 48.02% | 36.46% | 6.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RLTY Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund | 8.55% | 8.98% | 8.93% | 9.18% | 6.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCI and RLTY have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCI has higher volatility (12.11%) compared to RLTY (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCI dropped -47.16% vs RLTY's -35.44%.
RLTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCI and RLTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer