BSVO vs. IWN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BSVO (EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF) and IWN (iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. BSVO is actively managed, while IWN is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSVO returned 18.56%/yr vs 17.66%/yr for IWN. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BSVO charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for IWN.

Performance

BSVO vs. IWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BSVO having a 18.09% return and IWN slightly lower at 17.42%.

BSVO

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 18.09%
• 6M: 17.20%
• 1Y: 41.30%
• 3Y*: 18.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IWN

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 2.73%
• YTD: 17.42%
• 6M: 16.54%
• 1Y: 41.15%
• 3Y*: 17.66%
• 5Y*: 6.48%
• 10Y*: 10.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSVO vs. IWN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF	18.09%	9.21%	4.68%	22.38%
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF	17.42%	12.40%	7.63%	17.76%

Correlation

The correlation between BSVO and IWN is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2023	0.96

The correlation between BSVO and IWN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

BSVO vs. IWN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSVO	IWN
Financial Services	32.3%	24.2%
Energy	15.8%	9.2%
Consumer Cyclical	14.3%	8.7%
Industrials	13.8%	11.1%
Basic Materials	6.0%	5.4%
Technology	4.9%	12.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	2.0%
Communication Services	3.9%	1.6%
Healthcare	3.6%	8.8%
Real Estate	0.6%	10.2%
Utilities	-	5.7%

Return for Risk

BSVO vs. IWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSVO

BSVO Risk / Return Rank: 72
BSVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BSVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
BSVO Omega Ratio Rank: 63
BSVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
BSVO Martin Ratio Rank: 75

IWN

IWN Risk / Return Rank: 74
IWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
IWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
IWN Omega Ratio Rank: 64
IWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
IWN Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSVO vs. IWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSVO	IWN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.33	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	3.28	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.40	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.99	4.89	+0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.22	16.44	-2.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSVO vs. IWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSVO Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the IWN Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSVO and IWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSVO	IWN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	2.33	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.44	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.39	+0.39

Drawdowns

BSVO vs. IWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSVO drawdown since its inception was -28.67%, smaller than the maximum IWN drawdown of -61.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSVO and IWN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSVO	IWN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.67%	-61.55%	+32.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.31%	-8.45%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.67%	-26.70%	-1.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.86%	-1.47%	-0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.73%	-10.16%	+4.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	2.51%	+0.40%

Volatility

BSVO vs. IWN - Volatility Comparison

EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) have volatilities of 4.77% and 4.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSVO	IWN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.77%	4.91%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.95%	11.86%	+0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.88%	17.81%	+1.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.72%	21.43%	+0.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.72%	23.39%	-1.67%

BSVO vs. IWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSVO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than IWN's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSVO vs. IWN - Dividend Comparison

BSVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than IWN's 1.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF	1.29%	1.52%	1.61%	1.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF	1.46%	1.70%	1.80%	2.04%	2.12%	1.48%	1.60%	1.92%	1.99%	1.78%	1.74%	2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSVO and IWN in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, BSVO and IWN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BSVO or IWN?

IWN has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to BSVO (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSVO dropped -28.67% vs IWN's -61.55%.

Which ETF is better, BSVO or IWN?

On 3-year performance, BSVO leads with 18.56% vs 17.66% for IWN. On fees, IWN is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, BSVO has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSVO or IWN?

Over the 3-year period, BSVO has performed better with a 18.56% return vs 17.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSVO or IWN?

IWN is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for BSVO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSVO or IWN?

IWN has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 1.29% for BSVO.

What is the main difference between BSVO and IWN?

They also come from different issuers: Bridgeway and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for BSVO and 0.24% for IWN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.