BSV vs. BDN
BSV (Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares) is Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. 1–5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index, while BDN (Brandywine Realty Trust) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, BSV returned 1.95%/yr vs -8.24%/yr for BDN. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
BSV vs. BDN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSV achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than BDN's 10.64% return. Over the past 10 years, BSV has outperformed BDN with an annualized return of 1.95%, while BDN has yielded a comparatively lower -8.24% annualized return.
BSV
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 3.68%
- 3Y*
- 4.41%
- 5Y*
- 1.62%
- 10Y*
- 1.95%
BDN
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 6M
- -2.69%
- 1Y
- -21.26%
- 3Y*
- 2.49%
- 5Y*
- -18.44%
- 10Y*
- -8.24%
BSV vs. BDN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 0.29% | 6.00% | 3.78% | 4.90% | -5.49% | -1.09% | 4.70% | 4.98% | 1.34% | 1.20% |
BDN Brandywine Realty Trust | 10.64% | -41.31% | 17.13% | 1.73% | -50.65% | 19.50% | -19.06% | 28.95% | -26.04% | 14.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSV and BDN is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2007 | -0.01 |
The correlation between BSV and BDN shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSV vs. BDN — Risk / Return Rank
BSV
BDN
BSV vs. BDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) and Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSV | BDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 0.91 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | -0.49 | +3.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.07 | -0.88 | +10.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSV | BDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | -0.63 | +2.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | -0.49 | +1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | -0.23 | +1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.02 | +0.84 |
Drawdowns
BSV vs. BDN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSV drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum BDN drawdown of -96.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSV and BDN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSV | BDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -96.84% | +88.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.29% | -43.44% | +42.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.53% | -56.26% | +54.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.54% | -73.17% | +64.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.54% | -73.17% | +64.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -67.02% | +66.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.97% | -39.24% | +38.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.37% | 24.27% | -23.90% |
Volatility
BSV vs. BDN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) is 0.52%, while Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) has a volatility of 7.89%. This indicates that BSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSV | BDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.52% | 7.89% | -7.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.26% | 26.13% | -24.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81% | 34.08% | -32.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.72% | 38.11% | -35.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.37% | 35.24% | -32.87% |
Dividends
BSV vs. BDN - Dividend Comparison
BSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than BDN's 12.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDN Brandywine Realty Trust | 12.79% | 18.15% | 10.71% | 13.33% | 12.36% | 5.66% | 6.38% | 4.83% | 5.59% | 3.52% | 3.76% | 4.39% |
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 4.00% | 3.83% | 3.38% | 2.46% | 1.50% | 1.45% | 1.79% | 2.29% | 1.99% | 1.65% | 1.48% | 1.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSV and BDN have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDN has higher volatility (7.89%) compared to BSV (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSV dropped -8.54% vs BDN's -96.84%.
BSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSV and BDN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer