BSV vs. BDN
BSV (Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares) is Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. 1–5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index, while BDN (Brandywine Realty Trust) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, BSV returned 1.92%/yr vs -8.20%/yr for BDN. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past.
Performance
BSV vs. BDN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSV achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than BDN's 16.82% return. Over the past 10 years, BSV has outperformed BDN with an annualized return of 1.92%, while BDN has yielded a comparatively lower -8.20% annualized return.
BSV
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 2.46%
- 3Y*
- 4.47%
- 5Y*
- 1.62%
- 10Y*
- 1.92%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.52%
BDN
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- 6M
- 17.33%
- YTD
- 16.82%
- 1Y
- -8.59%
- 3Y*
- -3.27%
- 5Y*
- -16.18%
- 10Y*
- -8.20%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.07M | $6.77M | $5.96M | |
| $128.14M | $170.40M | $199.65M |
BSV vs. BDN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 0.52% | 6.00% | 3.78% | 4.90% | -5.49% | -1.09% | 4.70% | 4.98% | 1.34% | 1.20% |
BDN Brandywine Realty Trust | 16.82% | -41.31% | 17.13% | 1.73% | -50.65% | 19.50% | -19.06% | 28.95% | -26.04% | 14.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSV and BDN is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007 | -0.01 |
The correlation between BSV and BDN shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSV vs. BDN — Risk / Return Rank
BSV
BDN
BSV vs. BDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) and Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSV | BDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.99 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | -0.20 | +2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.92 | -0.33 | +6.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSV vs. BDN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSV drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum BDN drawdown of -96.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSV and BDN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSV | BDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -96.84% | +88.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.29% | -43.44% | +42.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.53% | -56.26% | +54.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.39% | -73.17% | +64.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.54% | -73.17% | +64.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -65.18% | +64.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.97% | -39.34% | +38.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.42% | 26.06% | -25.64% |
Volatility
BSV vs. BDN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) is 0.47%, while Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) has a volatility of 10.09%. This indicates that BSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSV | BDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.47% | 10.09% | -9.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.41% | 25.80% | -24.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71% | 34.50% | -32.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.74% | 38.29% | -35.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.38% | 35.42% | -33.04% |
Dividends
BSV vs. BDN - Dividend Comparison
BSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, less than BDN's 10.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDN Brandywine Realty Trust | 10.19% | 18.15% | 10.71% | 13.33% | 12.36% | 5.66% | 6.38% | 4.83% | 5.59% | 3.52% | 3.76% | 4.39% |
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 4.04% | 3.83% | 3.38% | 2.46% | 1.50% | 1.45% | 1.79% | 2.29% | 1.99% | 1.65% | 1.48% | 1.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSV and BDN have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDN has higher volatility (10.09%) compared to BSV (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSV dropped -8.54% vs BDN's -96.84%.
BSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSV and BDN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer