PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDN vs. DEI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BDN vs. DEI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) and Douglas Emmett, Inc. (DEI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDN achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly higher than DEI's 8.58% return. Over the past 10 years, BDN has underperformed DEI with an annualized return of -7.90%, while DEI has yielded a comparatively higher -6.45% annualized return.


BDN

1D
2.27%
1M
5.33%
YTD
14.63%
6M
16.23%
1Y
-18.05%
3Y*
3.79%
5Y*
-17.36%
10Y*
-7.90%

DEI

1D
-0.26%
1M
2.01%
YTD
8.58%
6M
9.95%
1Y
-16.82%
3Y*
6.72%
5Y*
-15.43%
10Y*
-6.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDN vs. DEI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BDN
Brandywine Realty Trust
14.63%-41.31%17.13%1.73%-50.65%19.50%-19.06%28.95%-26.04%14.42%
DEI
Douglas Emmett, Inc.
8.58%-37.51%34.59%-1.87%-50.89%18.75%-30.86%31.96%-14.54%15.04%

Correlation

The correlation between BDN and DEI is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2006

0.75

The correlation between BDN and DEI shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BDN:

$549.07M

DEI:

$1.96B

EPS

BDN:

-$1.16

DEI:

-$0.16

PS Ratio

BDN:

1.12

DEI:

1.95

PB Ratio

BDN:

0.75

DEI:

1.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

BDN:

$489.94M

DEI:

$1.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BDN:

$343.79M

DEI:

$277.78M

EBITDA (TTM)

BDN:

$38.42M

DEI:

$544.46M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDN vs. DEI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDN
BDN Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
BDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDN Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDN Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

DEI
DEI Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
DEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEI Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
DEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEI Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDN vs. DEI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) and Douglas Emmett, Inc. (DEI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BDNDEIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

0.93

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.42

-0.38

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.73

-0.62

-0.11

BDN vs. DEI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDN Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is comparable to the DEI Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDN and DEI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BDN vs. DEI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDN drawdown since its inception was -96.84%, which is greater than DEI's maximum drawdown of -76.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDN and DEI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDNDEIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.84%

-76.53%

-20.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.44%

-44.09%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.26%

-51.83%

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.17%

-70.10%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.17%

-74.01%

+0.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.83%

-65.00%

-0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.27%

-26.15%

-13.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.82%

27.13%

-2.31%

Volatility

BDN vs. DEI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) is 7.67%, while Douglas Emmett, Inc. (DEI) has a volatility of 8.73%. This indicates that BDN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDNDEIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.67%

8.73%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.12%

22.40%

+3.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.21%

30.17%

+4.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.17%

36.49%

+1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.31%

32.72%

+2.59%

Dividends

BDN vs. DEI - Dividend Comparison

BDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.34%, more than DEI's 6.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDN
Brandywine Realty Trust
12.34%18.15%10.71%13.33%12.36%5.66%6.38%4.83%5.59%3.52%3.76%4.39%
DEI
Douglas Emmett, Inc.
6.50%6.92%4.09%5.24%6.57%3.34%3.84%2.41%2.96%2.29%2.43%2.73%

Financials

BDN vs. DEI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brandywine Realty Trust and Douglas Emmett, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


120.00M140.00M160.00M180.00M200.00M220.00M240.00M260.00M20222023202420252026
127.00M
250.96M
(BDN) Total Revenue
(DEI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BDN vs. DEI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brandywine Realty Trust and Douglas Emmett, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
91.1%
0
Portfolio components
BDN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brandywine Realty Trust reported a gross profit of 115.68M and revenue of 127.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.1%.

DEI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Douglas Emmett, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 250.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BDN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brandywine Realty Trust reported an operating income of 1.51M and revenue of 127.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.2%.

DEI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Douglas Emmett, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 250.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

BDN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brandywine Realty Trust reported a net income of -48.91M and revenue of 127.00M, resulting in a net margin of -38.5%.

DEI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Douglas Emmett, Inc. reported a net income of -2.50M and revenue of 250.96M, resulting in a net margin of -1.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BDN and DEI have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEI has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to BDN (7.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDN dropped -96.84% vs DEI's -76.53%.

BDN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.53 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDN and DEI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer