BDN vs. DEI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) and Douglas Emmett, Inc. (DEI).

Performance

BDN vs. DEI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) and Douglas Emmett, Inc. (DEI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BDN vs. DEI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BDN Brandywine Realty Trust	-6.77%	-41.31%	17.13%	1.73%	-50.65%	19.50%	-19.06%	28.95%	-26.04%	14.42%
DEI Douglas Emmett, Inc.	-14.27%	-37.51%	34.59%	-1.87%	-50.89%	18.75%	-30.86%	31.96%	-14.54%	15.04%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BDN : $460.30M DEI : $1.55B
EPS BDN : -$1.03 DEI : $0.10
PS Ratio BDN : 0.95 DEI : 1.54
PB Ratio BDN : 0.58 DEI : 0.81
Total Revenue (TTM) BDN : $484.45M DEI : $1.00B
Gross Profit (TTM) BDN : $122.83M DEI : $480.97M
EBITDA (TTM) BDN : $257.23M DEI : $600.85M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDN achieves a -6.77% return, which is significantly higher than DEI's -14.27% return. Over the past 10 years, BDN has underperformed DEI with an annualized return of -8.63%, while DEI has yielded a comparatively higher -7.56% annualized return.

BDN

• 1D: -2.21%
• 1M: -16.93%
• YTD: -6.77%
• 6M: -33.51%
• 1Y: -33.21%
• 3Y*: -6.32%
• 5Y*: -19.37%
• 10Y*: -8.63%

DEI

• 1D: -2.02%
• 1M: -3.07%
• YTD: -14.27%
• 6M: -39.30%
• 1Y: -39.43%
• 3Y*: -3.96%
• 5Y*: -18.04%
• 10Y*: -7.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BDN vs. DEI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDN

BDN Risk / Return Rank: 8
BDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
BDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
BDN Omega Ratio Rank: 9
BDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
BDN Martin Ratio Rank: 7

DEI

DEI Risk / Return Rank: 5
DEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
DEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
DEI Omega Ratio Rank: 5
DEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
DEI Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDN vs. DEI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) and Douglas Emmett, Inc. (DEI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BDN	DEI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.93	-1.20	+0.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.34	-1.81	+0.47
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	0.79	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	-0.88	+0.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.58	-1.63	+0.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BDN vs. DEI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDN Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is comparable to the DEI Sharpe Ratio of -1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDN and DEI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BDN	DEI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.93	-1.20	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.51	-0.50	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.25	-0.23	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	-0.04	+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between BDN and DEI is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BDN vs. DEI - Dividend Comparison

BDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.36%, more than DEI's 8.23% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BDN Brandywine Realty Trust	17.36%	18.15%	10.71%	13.33%	12.36%	5.66%	6.38%	4.83%	5.59%	3.52%	3.76%	4.39%
DEI Douglas Emmett, Inc.	8.23%	6.92%	4.09%	5.24%	6.57%	3.34%	3.84%	2.41%	2.96%	2.29%	2.43%	2.73%

Drawdowns

BDN vs. DEI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDN drawdown since its inception was -96.84%, which is greater than DEI's maximum drawdown of -76.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDN and DEI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDN	DEI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.84%	-76.53%	-20.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.44%	-44.09%	+0.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.17%	-70.10%	-3.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.17%	-74.01%	+0.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-72.21%	-72.37%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.12%	-25.69%	-13.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.98%	23.71%	-2.73%

Volatility

BDN vs. DEI - Volatility Comparison

Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) has a higher volatility of 11.40% compared to Douglas Emmett, Inc. (DEI) at 8.34%. This indicates that BDN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BDN	DEI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.40%	8.34%	+3.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.33%	20.59%	+5.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.66%	33.00%	+2.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.89%	36.11%	+1.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.08%	32.42%	+2.66%

Financials

BDN vs. DEI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brandywine Realty Trust and Douglas Emmett, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BDN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brandywine Realty Trust reported a gross profit of -102.32M and revenue of 120.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -84.6%.

DEI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Douglas Emmett, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 249.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BDN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brandywine Realty Trust reported an operating income of 81.77M and revenue of 120.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.

DEI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Douglas Emmett, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 249.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

BDN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brandywine Realty Trust reported a net income of -36.85M and revenue of 120.95M, resulting in a net margin of -30.5%.

DEI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Douglas Emmett, Inc. reported a net income of -6.84M and revenue of 249.43M, resulting in a net margin of -2.7%.