BDN vs. FBND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BDN (Brandywine Realty Trust) is a stock, while FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, BDN returned -8.24%/yr vs 2.56%/yr for FBND. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BDN vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDN achieves a 10.64% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's 0.50% return. Over the past 10 years, BDN has underperformed FBND with an annualized return of -8.24%, while FBND has yielded a comparatively higher 2.56% annualized return.

BDN

• 1D: -2.56%
• 1M: 4.45%
• YTD: 10.64%
• 6M: -2.69%
• 1Y: -21.26%
• 3Y*: 2.49%
• 5Y*: -18.44%
• 10Y*: -8.24%

FBND

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 0.50%
• 6M: 0.30%
• 1Y: 5.59%
• 3Y*: 4.70%
• 5Y*: 0.83%
• 10Y*: 2.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDN vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BDN Brandywine Realty Trust	10.64%	-41.31%	17.13%	1.73%	-50.65%	19.50%	-19.06%	28.95%	-26.04%	14.42%
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF	0.50%	7.57%	2.13%	6.81%	-12.54%	-0.43%	9.41%	9.82%	-0.57%	3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between BDN and FBND is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2014	0.18

The correlation between BDN and FBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BDN vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDN

BDN Risk / Return Rank: 18
BDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
BDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
BDN Omega Ratio Rank: 16
BDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
BDN Martin Ratio Rank: 23

FBND

FBND Risk / Return Rank: 40
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDN vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BDN	FBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.63	1.46	-2.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.80	2.17	-2.97
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.25	-0.34
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.49	2.11	-2.60
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.88	6.37	-7.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BDN vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDN Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDN and FBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BDN	FBND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.63	1.46	-2.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.49	0.14	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.23	0.42	-0.66
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	0.44	-0.43

Drawdowns

BDN vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDN drawdown since its inception was -96.84%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDN and FBND.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDN	FBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.84%	-17.25%	-79.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.44%	-2.66%	-40.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.26%	-5.94%	-50.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.17%	-17.25%	-55.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.17%	-17.25%	-55.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.02%	-1.43%	-65.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.24%	-3.35%	-35.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.27%	0.88%	+23.39%

Volatility

BDN vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) has a higher volatility of 7.89% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.27%. This indicates that BDN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BDN	FBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.89%	1.27%	+6.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.13%	2.73%	+23.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.08%	3.86%	+30.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.11%	5.92%	+32.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.24%	6.10%	+29.14%

Dividends

BDN vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

BDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.79%, more than FBND's 4.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BDN Brandywine Realty Trust	12.79%	18.15%	10.71%	13.33%	12.36%	5.66%	6.38%	4.83%	5.59%	3.52%	3.76%	4.39%
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF	4.70%	4.70%	4.73%	4.26%	3.07%	1.86%	4.25%	2.90%	2.93%	2.56%	2.84%	3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BDN and FBND in my portfolio?

BDN and FBND have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BDN or FBND?

BDN has higher volatility (7.89%) compared to FBND (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDN dropped -96.84% vs FBND's -17.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.