BDN vs. CTO

In the year-to-date period, BDN achieves a -23.42% return, which is significantly lower than CTO's -6.86% return. Over the past 10 years, BDN has underperformed CTO with an annualized return of -5.70%, while CTO has yielded a comparatively higher 5.73% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) and CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BDN Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the CTO Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDN and CTO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.89%, more than CTO's 8.45% yield.

The maximum BDN drawdown since its inception was -97.00%, which is greater than CTO's maximum drawdown of -75.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDN and CTO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) has a higher volatility of 15.08% compared to CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) at 9.14%. This indicates that BDN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brandywine Realty Trust and CTO Realty Growth, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.