PortfoliosLab logo
BDN vs. SLG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BDN and SLG is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

BDN vs. SLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) and SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BDN:

-0.03

SLG:

0.28

Sortino Ratio

BDN:

0.17

SLG:

0.63

Omega Ratio

BDN:

1.02

SLG:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

BDN:

-0.03

SLG:

0.24

Martin Ratio

BDN:

-0.10

SLG:

0.60

Ulcer Index

BDN:

18.83%

SLG:

16.71%

Daily Std Dev

BDN:

36.63%

SLG:

36.69%

Max Drawdown

BDN:

-97.00%

SLG:

-94.02%

Current Drawdown

BDN:

-59.76%

SLG:

-30.47%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BDN:

$740.70M

SLG:

$4.43B

EPS

BDN:

-$1.20

SLG:

-$0.42

PEG Ratio

BDN:

14.94

SLG:

0.95

PS Ratio

BDN:

2.37

SLG:

6.83

PB Ratio

BDN:

0.76

SLG:

1.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

BDN:

$500.55M

SLG:

$938.24M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BDN:

$268.86M

SLG:

$521.83M

EBITDA (TTM)

BDN:

-$231.13M

SLG:

$426.66M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDN achieves a -20.76% return, which is significantly lower than SLG's -16.77% return. Over the past 10 years, BDN has underperformed SLG with an annualized return of -4.97%, while SLG has yielded a comparatively higher -2.48% annualized return.


BDN

YTD

-20.76%

1M

11.20%

6M

-17.67%

1Y

-1.14%

3Y*

-17.10%

5Y*

-5.72%

10Y*

-4.97%

SLG

YTD

-16.77%

1M

11.15%

6M

-26.76%

1Y

10.11%

3Y*

4.88%

5Y*

16.38%

10Y*

-2.48%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Brandywine Realty Trust

SL Green Realty Corp.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BDN vs. SLG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDN is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDN is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDN is 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDN is 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDN is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDN is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

SLG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SLG is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SLG is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SLG is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SLG is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SLG is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SLG is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BDN vs. SLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) and SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BDN Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the SLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDN and SLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

BDN vs. SLG - Dividend Comparison

BDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.39%, more than SLG's 5.47% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BDN
Brandywine Realty Trust
14.39%10.71%13.33%12.36%5.66%6.38%4.83%5.59%3.52%3.76%4.39%3.75%
SLG
SL Green Realty Corp.
5.47%4.43%7.15%10.95%8.49%7.82%3.74%4.16%3.11%2.73%2.23%1.77%

Drawdowns

BDN vs. SLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDN drawdown since its inception was -97.00%, roughly equal to the maximum SLG drawdown of -94.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDN and SLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BDN vs. SLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) is 7.64%, while SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that BDN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BDN vs. SLG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brandywine Realty Trust and SL Green Realty Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20212022202320242025
121.52M
239.85M
(BDN) Total Revenue
(SLG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BDN vs. SLG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brandywine Realty Trust and SL Green Realty Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
60.8%
49.5%
(BDN) Gross Margin
(SLG) Gross Margin
BDN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Brandywine Realty Trust reported a gross profit of 73.93M and revenue of 121.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.8%.

SLG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a gross profit of 118.74M and revenue of 239.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.

BDN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Brandywine Realty Trust reported an operating income of 15.16M and revenue of 121.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.5%.

SLG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SL Green Realty Corp. reported an operating income of 49.01M and revenue of 239.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.

BDN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Brandywine Realty Trust reported a net income of -27.40M and revenue of 121.52M, resulting in a net margin of -22.6%.

SLG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a net income of -15.18M and revenue of 239.85M, resulting in a net margin of -6.3%.