BSR vs. TDSB
BSR (Beacon Selective Risk ETF) and TDSB (Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. BSR is passively managed, while TDSB is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSR returned 7.80%/yr vs 8.91%/yr for TDSB. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSR charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for TDSB.
Performance
BSR vs. TDSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSR achieves a 3.50% return, which is significantly lower than TDSB's 4.87% return.
BSR
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 3.50%
- 6M
- 3.43%
- 1Y
- 11.82%
- 3Y*
- 7.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDSB
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 4.87%
- 6M
- 5.00%
- 1Y
- 14.94%
- 3Y*
- 8.91%
- 5Y*
- 2.22%
- 10Y*
- —
BSR vs. TDSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BSR Beacon Selective Risk ETF | 3.50% | 4.21% | 12.44% | 4.57% |
TDSB Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF | 4.87% | 12.95% | 3.56% | 6.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSR and TDSB is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2023 | 0.61 |
The correlation between BSR and TDSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
BSR vs. TDSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSR
TDSB
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Energy
BSR
TDSB
Utilities
BSR
TDSB
Consumer Defensive
BSR
TDSB
Healthcare
BSR
TDSB
Industrials
BSR
TDSB
Real Estate
BSR
TDSB
Basic Materials
BSR
TDSB
Technology
BSR
TDSB
Consumer Cyclical
BSR
TDSB
Communication Services
BSR
TDSB
Financial Services
BSR
TDSB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSR vs. TDSB — Risk / Return Rank
BSR
TDSB
BSR vs. TDSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Beacon Selective Risk ETF (BSR) and Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSR | TDSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.48 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 3.23 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.48 | 12.83 | -7.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSR | TDSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 2.51 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.32 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
BSR vs. TDSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSR drawdown since its inception was -15.68%, smaller than the maximum TDSB drawdown of -19.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSR and TDSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSR | TDSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.68% | -19.56% | +3.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.15% | -4.64% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.68% | -6.84% | -8.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.32% | -0.59% | -3.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.58% | -9.12% | +4.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 1.17% | +0.99% |
Volatility
BSR vs. TDSB - Volatility Comparison
Beacon Selective Risk ETF (BSR) has a higher volatility of 2.18% compared to Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) at 1.63%. This indicates that BSR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSR | TDSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.18% | 1.63% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.41% | 5.02% | +1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.66% | 5.98% | +2.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 7.32% | +8.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 7.53% | +8.73% |
BSR vs. TDSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSR has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than TDSB's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSR vs. TDSB - Dividend Comparison
BSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than TDSB's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSR Beacon Selective Risk ETF | 2.80% | 2.89% | 0.89% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDSB Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF | 2.12% | 1.93% | 3.50% | 2.77% | 1.81% | 1.75% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSR and TDSB have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSR has higher volatility (2.18%) compared to TDSB (1.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSR dropped -15.68% vs TDSB's -19.56%.
On 3-year performance, TDSB leads with 8.91% vs 7.80% for BSR. On fees, TDSB is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, TDSB has been the lower-risk option at 1.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TDSB has performed better with a 8.91% return vs 7.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TDSB is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for BSR.
BSR has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 2.12% for TDSB.
They also come from different issuers: American Beacon and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for BSR and 0.69% for TDSB.
TDSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSR and TDSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer