PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSR vs. TDSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSR vs. TDSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Beacon Selective Risk ETF (BSR) and Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BSR having a 3.49% return and TDSB slightly lower at 3.36%.


BSR

1D
0.51%
1M
0.17%
YTD
3.49%
6M
2.39%
1Y
10.95%
3Y*
7.38%
5Y*
10Y*

TDSB

1D
0.56%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
3.36%
6M
2.80%
1Y
13.01%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
1.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSR vs. TDSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BSR
Beacon Selective Risk ETF
3.49%4.21%12.44%4.67%
TDSB
Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF
3.36%12.95%3.56%6.44%

Correlation

The correlation between BSR and TDSB is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023

0.61

The correlation between BSR and TDSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSR vs. TDSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSR
BSR Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSR Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSR Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

TDSB
TDSB Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TDSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDSB Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
TDSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDSB Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSR vs. TDSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Beacon Selective Risk ETF (BSR) and Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSRTDSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.38

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

2.81

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.77

10.40

-5.63

BSR vs. TDSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSR Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the TDSB Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSR and TDSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSR vs. TDSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSR drawdown since its inception was -15.68%, smaller than the maximum TDSB drawdown of -19.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSR and TDSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSRTDSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.68%

-19.56%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.15%

-4.64%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.68%

-6.84%

-8.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.32%

-2.01%

-2.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.58%

-9.06%

+4.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

1.25%

+1.05%

Volatility

BSR vs. TDSB - Volatility Comparison

Beacon Selective Risk ETF (BSR) and Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) have volatilities of 2.42% and 2.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSRTDSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

2.36%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.51%

5.40%

+1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.76%

6.35%

+2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

7.37%

+8.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.15%

7.55%

+8.60%

BSR vs. TDSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSR has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than TDSB's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSR vs. TDSB - Dividend Comparison

BSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than TDSB's 2.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BSR
Beacon Selective Risk ETF
2.80%2.89%0.89%1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDSB
Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF
2.15%1.93%3.50%2.77%1.81%1.75%0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSR and TDSB have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSR has higher volatility (2.42%) compared to TDSB (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSR dropped -15.68% vs TDSB's -19.56%.

On 3-year performance, TDSB leads with 8.46% vs 7.38% for BSR. On fees, TDSB is cheaper at 0.69% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TDSB has performed better with a 8.46% return vs 7.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDSB is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for BSR.

BSR has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 2.15% for TDSB.

They also come from different issuers: American Beacon and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for BSR and 0.69% for TDSB.

TDSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSR and TDSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer