PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMY vs. MLPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSMY vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMY) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMY achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than MLPX's 23.59% return.


BSMY

1D
0.03%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.83%
1Y
8.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MLPX

1D
-0.39%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
23.59%
6M
23.51%
1Y
22.94%
3Y*
28.13%
5Y*
20.92%
10Y*
12.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMY vs. MLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BSMY
Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF
1.43%3.82%-1.86%
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
23.59%4.96%15.93%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMY and MLPX is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2024

-0.02

The correlation between BSMY and MLPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BSMY vs. MLPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSMY
MLPX

Financial Services

2.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%

-

Industrials

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

99.5%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

0.3%

Financial Services

BSMY
2.2%
MLPX

-

Consumer Cyclical

BSMY
0.2%
MLPX

-

Industrials

BSMY
0.0%
MLPX

-

Basic Materials

BSMY

-

MLPX

-

Communication Services

BSMY

-

MLPX

-

Consumer Defensive

BSMY

-

MLPX

-

Energy

BSMY

-

MLPX
99.5%

Healthcare

BSMY

-

MLPX

-

Real Estate

BSMY

-

MLPX

-

Technology

BSMY

-

MLPX

-

Utilities

BSMY

-

MLPX
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSMY vs. MLPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMY
BSMY Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BSMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMY Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMY Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPX
MLPX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMY vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMY) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSMYMLPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.26

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.82

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.53

7.27

+1.26

BSMY vs. MLPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMY Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the MLPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMY and MLPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSMYMLPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

1.50

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.35

+0.02

Drawdowns

BSMY vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMY drawdown since its inception was -6.81%, smaller than the maximum MLPX drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMY and MLPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMYMLPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.81%

-70.67%

+63.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-8.18%

+4.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-5.68%

+4.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.98%

-16.63%

+14.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

3.17%

-2.22%

Volatility

BSMY vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMY) is 1.28%, while Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that BSMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSMYMLPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

6.41%

-5.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.55%

11.84%

-9.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.46%

15.38%

-11.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.23%

20.08%

-14.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.23%

26.50%

-21.27%

BSMY vs. MLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMY has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSMY vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison

BSMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, less than MLPX's 4.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSMY
Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF
3.53%3.31%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
4.15%4.88%4.30%5.22%5.23%5.98%8.32%5.78%5.77%4.36%5.50%4.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSMY and MLPX have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLPX has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to BSMY (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMY dropped -6.81% vs MLPX's -70.67%.

On 1-year performance, MLPX leads with 22.94% vs 8.12% for BSMY. On fees, BSMY is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMY has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MLPX has performed better with a 22.94% return vs 8.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSMY is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for MLPX.

MLPX has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 3.53% for BSMY.

BSMY is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while MLPX is MLPs. BSMY tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2034 Index, while MLPX tracks Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMY and 0.45% for MLPX.

BSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSMY and MLPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer