BSMY vs. MLPX
BSMY (Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF) and MLPX (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSMY is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2034 Index, while MLPX is a MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BSMY returned 8.12% vs 22.94% for MLPX. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. BSMY charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for MLPX.
Performance
BSMY vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSMY achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than MLPX's 23.59% return.
BSMY
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 8.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MLPX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- 23.59%
- 6M
- 23.51%
- 1Y
- 22.94%
- 3Y*
- 28.13%
- 5Y*
- 20.92%
- 10Y*
- 12.41%
BSMY vs. MLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BSMY Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.43% | 3.82% | -1.86% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 23.59% | 4.96% | 15.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSMY and MLPX is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2024 | -0.02 |
The correlation between BSMY and MLPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BSMY vs. MLPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSMY
MLPX
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
BSMY
MLPX
-
Consumer Cyclical
BSMY
MLPX
-
Industrials
BSMY
MLPX
-
Basic Materials
BSMY
-
MLPX
-
Communication Services
BSMY
-
MLPX
-
Consumer Defensive
BSMY
-
MLPX
-
Energy
BSMY
-
MLPX
Healthcare
BSMY
-
MLPX
-
Real Estate
BSMY
-
MLPX
-
Technology
BSMY
-
MLPX
-
Utilities
BSMY
-
MLPX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSMY vs. MLPX — Risk / Return Rank
BSMY
MLPX
BSMY vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMY) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSMY | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.26 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 2.82 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.53 | 7.27 | +1.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSMY | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 1.50 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.35 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
BSMY vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSMY drawdown since its inception was -6.81%, smaller than the maximum MLPX drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMY and MLPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSMY | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.81% | -70.67% | +63.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.31% | -8.18% | +4.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | -5.68% | +4.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.98% | -16.63% | +14.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 3.17% | -2.22% |
Volatility
BSMY vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMY) is 1.28%, while Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that BSMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSMY | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | 6.41% | -5.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.55% | 11.84% | -9.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46% | 15.38% | -11.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.23% | 20.08% | -14.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.23% | 26.50% | -21.27% |
BSMY vs. MLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSMY has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSMY vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison
BSMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, less than MLPX's 4.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMY Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF | 3.53% | 3.31% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.15% | 4.88% | 4.30% | 5.22% | 5.23% | 5.98% | 8.32% | 5.78% | 5.77% | 4.36% | 5.50% | 4.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSMY and MLPX have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLPX has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to BSMY (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMY dropped -6.81% vs MLPX's -70.67%.
On 1-year performance, MLPX leads with 22.94% vs 8.12% for BSMY. On fees, BSMY is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMY has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MLPX has performed better with a 22.94% return vs 8.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSMY is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for MLPX.
MLPX has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 3.53% for BSMY.
BSMY is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while MLPX is MLPs. BSMY tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2034 Index, while MLPX tracks Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMY and 0.45% for MLPX.
BSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSMY and MLPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer