BSMY vs. TNGY
BSMY (Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF) and TNGY (Tortoise Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BSMY is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2034 Index, while TNGY is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Tortoise Capital. BSMY is passively managed, while TNGY is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. BSMY charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TNGY.
Performance
BSMY vs. TNGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSMY achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than TNGY's 15.21% return.
BSMY
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 8.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TNGY
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- 15.21%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSMY vs. TNGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSMY Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.43% | 5.78% |
TNGY Tortoise Energy Fund | 15.21% | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSMY and TNGY is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSMY vs. TNGY — Risk / Return Rank
BSMY
TNGY
BSMY vs. TNGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMY) and Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSMY | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.53 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSMY | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 1.15 | -0.78 |
Drawdowns
BSMY vs. TNGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSMY drawdown since its inception was -6.81%, smaller than the maximum TNGY drawdown of -8.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMY and TNGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSMY | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.81% | -8.86% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | -3.92% | +3.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.98% | -2.18% | +0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | — | — |
Volatility
BSMY vs. TNGY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSMY | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.55% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46% | 15.70% | -12.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.23% | 15.70% | -10.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.23% | 15.70% | -10.47% |
BSMY vs. TNGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSMY has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than TNGY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSMY vs. TNGY - Dividend Comparison
BSMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than TNGY's 3.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BSMY Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF | 3.53% | 3.31% | 0.79% |
TNGY Tortoise Energy Fund | 3.41% | 2.59% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSMY and TNGY have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSMY is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSMY is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TNGY.
BSMY has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 3.41% for TNGY.
BSMY is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while TNGY is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Tortoise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMY and 0.85% for TNGY.
Find the right allocation for BSMY and TNGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer