PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMY vs. RINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSMY vs. RINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMY) and Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMY achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than RINT's 8.39% return.


BSMY

1D
0.03%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.83%
1Y
8.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RINT

1D
-0.77%
1M
3.99%
YTD
8.39%
6M
11.05%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMY vs. RINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BSMY and RINT is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSMY vs. RINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMY
BSMY Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BSMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMY Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMY Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

RINT
RINT Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
RINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RINT Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
RINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
RINT Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMY vs. RINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMY) and Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSMYRINTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.27

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

1.85

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.53

6.94

+1.59

BSMY vs. RINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMY Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the RINT Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMY and RINT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSMYRINTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

1.49

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

1.72

-1.35

Drawdowns

BSMY vs. RINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMY drawdown since its inception was -6.81%, smaller than the maximum RINT drawdown of -11.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMY and RINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMYRINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.81%

-11.91%

+5.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-11.91%

+8.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-0.86%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.98%

-1.82%

-0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

3.16%

-2.21%

Volatility

BSMY vs. RINT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMY) is 1.28%, while Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that BSMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSMYRINTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

4.31%

-3.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.55%

12.36%

-9.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.46%

14.79%

-11.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.23%

14.64%

-9.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.23%

14.64%

-9.41%

BSMY vs. RINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMY has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than RINT's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSMY vs. RINT - Dividend Comparison

BSMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than RINT's 0.82% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BSMY and RINT have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RINT has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to BSMY (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMY dropped -6.81% vs RINT's -11.91%.

On 1-year performance, RINT leads with 21.90% vs 8.12% for BSMY. On fees, BSMY is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMY has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RINT has performed better with a 21.90% return vs 8.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSMY is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for RINT.

BSMY has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 0.82% for RINT.

BSMY is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while RINT is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Russell. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMY and 0.49% for RINT.

BSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSMY and RINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer