BSMV vs. ENFR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BSMV (Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSMV is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2031 Index, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSMV returned 3.08%/yr vs 27.99%/yr for ENFR. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSMV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.

Performance

BSMV vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMV) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMV achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 24.60% return.

BSMV

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 0.68%
• 6M: 0.96%
• 1Y: 5.82%
• 3Y*: 3.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ENFR

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -1.01%
• YTD: 24.60%
• 6M: 24.41%
• 1Y: 25.40%
• 3Y*: 27.99%
• 5Y*: 19.91%
• 10Y*: 11.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMV vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BSMV Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF	0.68%	4.03%	-0.28%	6.99%	-15.32%	0.66%
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	24.60%	5.88%	42.17%	15.63%	17.48%	4.29%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMV and ENFR is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021	0.04

The correlation between BSMV and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.04 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BSMV vs. ENFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSMV	ENFR
Financial Services	3.5%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	98.8%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	3.4%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	1.0%

Return for Risk

BSMV vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMV

BSMV Risk / Return Rank: 64
BSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
BSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
BSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 82
BSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
BSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 41

ENFR

ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 50
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 47
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMV vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMV) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSMV	ENFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	1.75	+0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	2.41	+1.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.30	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	2.95	-0.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.48	8.06	-1.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSMV vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMV Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMV and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSMV	ENFR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	1.75	+0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.19	0.34	-0.53

Drawdowns

BSMV vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMV drawdown since its inception was -20.68%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMV and ENFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSMV	ENFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.68%	-68.28%	+47.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.79%	-8.64%	+5.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.63%	-15.58%	+8.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.43%	-4.95%	-0.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.44%	-15.98%	+5.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	3.16%	-2.26%

Volatility

BSMV vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMV) is 0.82%, while Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that BSMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSMV	ENFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.82%	6.18%	-5.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.79%	11.47%	-9.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.51%	14.64%	-12.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.69%	19.30%	-13.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.69%	24.69%	-19.00%

BSMV vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSMV vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

BSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than ENFR's 4.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSMV Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF	2.90%	2.93%	3.10%	2.59%	2.21%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.03%	4.77%	4.41%	5.48%	5.23%	7.86%	7.57%	5.81%	3.98%	2.98%	3.31%	3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSMV and ENFR in my portfolio?

BSMV and ENFR have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSMV or ENFR?

ENFR has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to BSMV (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMV dropped -20.68% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

Which ETF is better, BSMV or ENFR?

On 3-year performance, ENFR leads with 27.99% vs 3.08% for BSMV. On fees, BSMV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMV has been the lower-risk option at 0.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSMV or ENFR?

Over the 3-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 27.99% return vs 3.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSMV or ENFR?

BSMV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ENFR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSMV or ENFR?

ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 2.90% for BSMV.

What is the main difference between BSMV and ENFR?

BSMV is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while ENFR is Energy Equities. BSMV tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2031 Index, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMV and 0.35% for ENFR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.