PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMV vs. TNGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSMV vs. TNGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMV) and Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMV achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly lower than TNGY's 15.21% return.


BSMV

1D
0.20%
1M
0.32%
YTD
0.64%
6M
1.16%
1Y
5.86%
3Y*
3.07%
5Y*
10Y*

TNGY

1D
0.39%
1M
-3.15%
YTD
15.21%
6M
12.60%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMV vs. TNGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BSMV
Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF
0.64%4.65%
TNGY
Tortoise Energy Fund
15.21%1.81%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMV and TNGY is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025

-0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSMV vs. TNGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMV
BSMV Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

TNGY
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMV vs. TNGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMV) and Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSMVTNGYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.34

BSMV vs. TNGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSMVTNGYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.19

1.15

-1.34

Drawdowns

BSMV vs. TNGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMV drawdown since its inception was -20.68%, which is greater than TNGY's maximum drawdown of -8.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMV and TNGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMVTNGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.68%

-8.86%

-11.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.46%

-3.92%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.45%

-2.18%

-8.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

Volatility

BSMV vs. TNGY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSMVTNGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52%

15.70%

-13.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.69%

15.70%

-10.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.69%

15.70%

-10.01%

BSMV vs. TNGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than TNGY's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSMV vs. TNGY - Dividend Comparison

BSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than TNGY's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BSMV
Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF
2.90%2.93%3.10%2.59%2.21%0.24%
TNGY
Tortoise Energy Fund
3.41%2.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSMV and TNGY have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BSMV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSMV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TNGY.

TNGY has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 2.90% for BSMV.

BSMV is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while TNGY is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Tortoise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMV and 0.85% for TNGY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSMV and TNGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer