BSMV vs. TNGY
BSMV (Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF) and TNGY (Tortoise Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BSMV is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2031 Index, while TNGY is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Tortoise Capital. BSMV is passively managed, while TNGY is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. BSMV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TNGY.
Performance
BSMV vs. TNGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSMV achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly lower than TNGY's 15.21% return.
BSMV
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 5.86%
- 3Y*
- 3.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TNGY
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- 15.21%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSMV vs. TNGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSMV Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF | 0.64% | 4.65% |
TNGY Tortoise Energy Fund | 15.21% | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSMV and TNGY is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSMV vs. TNGY — Risk / Return Rank
BSMV
TNGY
BSMV vs. TNGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMV) and Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSMV | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.34 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.52 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.34 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSMV | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.19 | 1.15 | -1.34 |
Drawdowns
BSMV vs. TNGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSMV drawdown since its inception was -20.68%, which is greater than TNGY's maximum drawdown of -8.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMV and TNGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSMV | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.68% | -8.86% | -11.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.46% | -3.92% | -1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.45% | -2.18% | -8.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | — | — |
Volatility
BSMV vs. TNGY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSMV | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.82% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52% | 15.70% | -13.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.69% | 15.70% | -10.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.69% | 15.70% | -10.01% |
BSMV vs. TNGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSMV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than TNGY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSMV vs. TNGY - Dividend Comparison
BSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than TNGY's 3.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMV Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.90% | 2.93% | 3.10% | 2.59% | 2.21% | 0.24% |
TNGY Tortoise Energy Fund | 3.41% | 2.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSMV and TNGY have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSMV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSMV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TNGY.
TNGY has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 2.90% for BSMV.
BSMV is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while TNGY is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Tortoise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMV and 0.85% for TNGY.
Find the right allocation for BSMV and TNGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer