BSMV vs. PIT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BSMV (Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF) and PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSMV is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2031 Index, while PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck. BSMV is passively managed, while PIT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSMV returned 3.08%/yr vs 24.30%/yr for PIT. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. BSMV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PIT.

Performance

BSMV vs. PIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMV) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMV achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 41.36% return.

BSMV

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 0.68%
• 6M: 0.96%
• 1Y: 5.82%
• 3Y*: 3.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PIT

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -2.84%
• YTD: 41.36%
• 6M: 42.58%
• 1Y: 62.93%
• 3Y*: 24.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMV vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BSMV Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF	0.68%	4.03%	-0.28%	6.99%	-0.35%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	41.36%	21.63%	6.77%	-4.54%	2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMV and PIT is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2022	-0.07

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between BSMV and PIT has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.07 to -0.29, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Return for Risk

BSMV vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMV

BSMV Risk / Return Rank: 64
BSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
BSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
BSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 82
BSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
BSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 41

PIT

PIT Risk / Return Rank: 87
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 84
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMV vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMV) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSMV	PIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	2.97	-0.64
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	3.53	-0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.52	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	6.83	-4.73
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.48	23.27	-16.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSMV vs. PIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMV Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the PIT Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMV and PIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSMV	PIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	2.97	-0.64
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.19	1.07	-1.26

Drawdowns

BSMV vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMV drawdown since its inception was -20.68%, which is greater than PIT's maximum drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMV and PIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSMV	PIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.68%	-12.27%	-8.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.79%	-9.27%	+6.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.63%	-12.27%	+5.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.43%	-4.56%	-0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.44%	-3.99%	-6.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	2.71%	-1.81%

Volatility

BSMV vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMV) is 0.82%, while VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) has a volatility of 6.08%. This indicates that BSMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSMV	PIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.82%	6.08%	-5.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.79%	19.02%	-17.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.51%	21.30%	-18.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.69%	17.47%	-11.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.69%	17.47%	-11.78%

BSMV vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSMV vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison

BSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than PIT's 6.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BSMV Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF	2.90%	2.93%	3.10%	2.59%	2.21%	0.24%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	6.31%	8.92%	3.59%	6.44%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSMV and PIT in my portfolio?

BSMV and PIT have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSMV or PIT?

PIT has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to BSMV (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMV dropped -20.68% vs PIT's -12.27%.

Which ETF is better, BSMV or PIT?

On 3-year performance, PIT leads with 24.30% vs 3.08% for BSMV. On fees, BSMV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMV has been the lower-risk option at 0.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSMV or PIT?

Over the 3-year period, PIT has performed better with a 24.30% return vs 3.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSMV or PIT?

BSMV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSMV or PIT?

PIT has the higher dividend yield at 6.31%, compared with 2.90% for BSMV.

What is the main difference between BSMV and PIT?

BSMV is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMV and 0.55% for PIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.