BSMU vs. XLG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BSMU (Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSMU is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco Bulletshares Municipal Bond 2030 Index, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSMU returned -0.68%/yr vs 16.24%/yr for XLG. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSMU charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

BSMU vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMU) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMU achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 7.57% return.

BSMU

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 0.56%
• 6M: 0.90%
• 1Y: 5.50%
• 3Y*: 3.02%
• 5Y*: -0.68%
• 10Y*: —

XLG

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: 4.22%
• YTD: 7.57%
• 6M: 7.32%
• 1Y: 28.54%
• 3Y*: 24.46%
• 5Y*: 16.24%
• 10Y*: 17.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMU vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BSMU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF	0.56%	4.35%	-0.29%	6.31%	-13.76%	1.88%	4.10%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	7.57%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	30.77%	4.11%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMU and XLG is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020	0.11

BSMU vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSMU	XLG
Financial Services	1.2%	9.6%
Basic Materials	-	0.6%
Communication Services	-	17.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.8%
Energy	-	2.7%
Healthcare	-	7.0%
Industrials	-	1.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	43.9%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BSMU vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMU

BSMU Risk / Return Rank: 72
BSMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
BSMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
BSMU Omega Ratio Rank: 89
BSMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
BSMU Martin Ratio Rank: 50

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 56
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 61
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMU vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMU) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSMU	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.59	2.15	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.96	2.92	+1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.38	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	2.31	+0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.28	8.66	-0.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSMU vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMU Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMU and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSMU	XLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.59	2.15	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.14	0.87	-1.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.62	-0.56

Drawdowns

BSMU vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMU drawdown since its inception was -19.48%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMU and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSMU	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.48%	-52.39%	+32.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.06%	-12.41%	+10.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.92%	-20.70%	+14.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.48%	-28.02%	+8.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.83%	-1.44%	-3.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.20%	-7.64%	-0.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.67%	3.30%	-2.63%

Volatility

BSMU vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMU) is 0.79%, while Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that BSMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSMU	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.79%	3.19%	-2.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.48%	9.80%	-8.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13%	13.33%	-11.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.83%	18.68%	-13.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.85%	18.84%	-13.99%

BSMU vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMU has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BSMU vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

BSMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than XLG's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSMU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF	2.80%	2.82%	2.92%	2.66%	2.16%	1.60%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.60%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSMU and XLG in my portfolio?

BSMU and XLG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSMU or XLG?

XLG has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to BSMU (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMU dropped -19.48% vs XLG's -52.39%.

Which ETF is better, BSMU or XLG?

On 5-year performance, XLG leads with 16.24% vs -0.68% for BSMU. On fees, BSMU is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSMU or XLG?

Over the 5-year period, XLG has performed better with a 16.24% return vs -0.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSMU or XLG?

BSMU is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSMU or XLG?

BSMU has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 0.60% for XLG.

What is the main difference between BSMU and XLG?

BSMU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while XLG is S&P 500. BSMU tracks Invesco Bulletshares Municipal Bond 2030 Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMU and 0.20% for XLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.