BSJS vs. ENFR
BSJS (Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSJS is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Nasdaq BulletSharesUSD High Yield Corporate Bond 2028 Index, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSJS returned 3.25%/yr vs 19.43%/yr for ENFR. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSJS charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.
Performance
BSJS vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSJS achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 25.97% return.
BSJS
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 6.36%
- 3Y*
- 8.40%
- 5Y*
- 3.25%
- 10Y*
- —
ENFR
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- 25.97%
- 6M
- 26.39%
- 1Y
- 26.11%
- 3Y*
- 28.39%
- 5Y*
- 19.43%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
BSJS vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJS Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.84% | 8.31% | 7.38% | 12.28% | -13.69% | 3.40% | 3.92% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 25.97% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | 17.48% | 39.97% | 13.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSJS and ENFR is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2020 | 0.37 |
The correlation between BSJS and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSJS vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
BSJS
ENFR
BSJS vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSJS | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.31 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 3.08 | +0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.43 | 8.18 | +10.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSJS vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSJS drawdown since its inception was -17.73%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJS and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSJS | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.73% | -68.28% | +50.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.64% | -8.64% | +7.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.44% | -15.58% | +11.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.73% | -20.29% | +2.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -3.91% | +3.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.97% | -15.95% | +11.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.34% | 3.25% | -2.91% |
Volatility
BSJS vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) is 0.76%, while Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that BSJS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSJS | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.76% | 5.63% | -4.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.06% | 11.48% | -9.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86% | 14.66% | -11.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.39% | 19.30% | -11.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.13% | 24.67% | -17.54% |
BSJS vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSJS has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSJS vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
BSJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, more than ENFR's 3.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJS Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.26% | 6.49% | 7.04% | 6.75% | 5.82% | 4.86% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.98% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSJS and ENFR have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENFR has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to BSJS (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJS dropped -17.73% vs ENFR's -68.28%.
On 5-year performance, ENFR leads with 19.43% vs 3.25% for BSJS. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BSJS has been the lower-risk option at 0.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 19.43% return vs 3.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJS.
BSJS has the higher dividend yield at 6.26%, compared with 3.98% for ENFR.
BSJS is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ENFR is Energy Equities. BSJS tracks Nasdaq BulletSharesUSD High Yield Corporate Bond 2028 Index, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJS and 0.35% for ENFR.
BSJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSJS and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer