PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJS vs. IGLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJS vs. IGLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) and iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJS achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly higher than IGLB's 1.19% return.


BSJS

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.81%
6M
1.95%
1Y
5.94%
3Y*
8.65%
5Y*
3.19%
10Y*

IGLB

1D
-0.42%
1M
1.36%
YTD
1.19%
6M
1.21%
1Y
6.56%
3Y*
4.26%
5Y*
-2.01%
10Y*
2.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJS vs. IGLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BSJS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.81%8.31%7.38%12.28%-13.69%3.40%3.92%
IGLB
iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
1.19%7.53%-1.50%11.03%-25.38%-1.68%3.56%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJS and IGLB is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2020

0.52

The correlation between BSJS and IGLB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJS vs. IGLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJS
BSJS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BSJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJS Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJS Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

IGLB
IGLB Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IGLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLB Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLB Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJS vs. IGLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) and iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSJSIGLBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.15

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

1.27

+2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.72

3.13

+14.58

BSJS vs. IGLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJS Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the IGLB Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJS and IGLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSJS vs. IGLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJS drawdown since its inception was -17.73%, smaller than the maximum IGLB drawdown of -34.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJS and IGLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJSIGLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.73%

-34.12%

+16.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.64%

-5.19%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.44%

-12.87%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.73%

-34.12%

+16.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-13.41%

+13.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-8.12%

+4.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

2.10%

-1.76%

Volatility

BSJS vs. IGLB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) is 0.61%, while iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGLB) has a volatility of 1.89%. This indicates that BSJS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJSIGLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

1.89%

-1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.08%

5.80%

-3.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83%

7.76%

-4.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.40%

12.38%

-4.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.11%

12.55%

-5.44%

BSJS vs. IGLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJS has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than IGLB's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJS vs. IGLB - Dividend Comparison

BSJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.79%, more than IGLB's 5.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSJS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.79%6.49%7.04%6.75%5.82%4.86%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGLB
iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
5.24%5.14%5.10%4.59%4.56%3.16%3.22%3.73%4.56%3.94%4.21%4.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJS and IGLB have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGLB has higher volatility (1.89%) compared to BSJS (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJS dropped -17.73% vs IGLB's -34.12%.

On 5-year performance, BSJS leads with 3.19% vs -2.01% for IGLB. On fees, IGLB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, BSJS has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BSJS has performed better with a 3.19% return vs -2.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGLB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJS.

BSJS has the higher dividend yield at 6.79%, compared with 5.24% for IGLB.

BSJS is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while IGLB is Corporate Bonds. BSJS tracks Nasdaq BulletSharesUSD High Yield Corporate Bond 2028 Index, while IGLB tracks ICE BofAML10+ Year US Corporate Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJS and 0.06% for IGLB.

BSJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJS and IGLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer