PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJS vs. BKHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJS vs. BKHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) and BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJS achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly lower than BKHY's 1.95% return.


BSJS

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.81%
6M
1.95%
1Y
5.94%
3Y*
8.65%
5Y*
3.19%
10Y*

BKHY

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.95%
6M
2.31%
1Y
6.98%
3Y*
9.06%
5Y*
4.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJS vs. BKHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BSJS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.81%8.31%7.38%12.28%-13.69%3.40%3.92%
BKHY
BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF
1.95%8.48%8.37%12.40%-10.97%4.75%6.06%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJS and BKHY is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2020

0.84

The correlation between BSJS and BKHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJS vs. BKHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJS
BSJS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BSJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJS Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJS Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BKHY
BKHY Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
BKHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
BKHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJS vs. BKHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) and BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSJSBKHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.37

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

2.77

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.72

12.66

+5.06

BSJS vs. BKHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJS Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the BKHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJS and BKHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSJS vs. BKHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJS drawdown since its inception was -17.73%, which is greater than BKHY's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJS and BKHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJSBKHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.73%

-15.89%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.64%

-2.53%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.44%

-4.87%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.73%

-15.89%

-1.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.25%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-2.95%

-1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

0.55%

-0.21%

Volatility

BSJS vs. BKHY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) is 0.61%, while BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) has a volatility of 0.92%. This indicates that BSJS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJSBKHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

0.92%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.08%

3.03%

-0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83%

3.74%

-0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.40%

7.59%

-0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.11%

7.34%

-0.23%

BSJS vs. BKHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJS has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than BKHY's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJS vs. BKHY - Dividend Comparison

BSJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.79%, less than BKHY's 7.45% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BKHY
BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF
7.45%7.33%7.34%8.67%6.59%6.78%4.65%
BSJS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.79%6.49%7.04%6.75%5.82%4.86%0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJS and BKHY have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKHY has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to BSJS (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJS dropped -17.73% vs BKHY's -15.89%.

On 5-year performance, BKHY leads with 4.07% vs 3.19% for BSJS. On fees, BKHY is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, BSJS has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BKHY has performed better with a 4.07% return vs 3.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKHY is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJS.

BKHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.45%, compared with 6.79% for BSJS.

BSJS tracks Nasdaq BulletSharesUSD High Yield Corporate Bond 2028 Index, while BKHY tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJS and 0.22% for BKHY.

BSJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJS and BKHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer