BSGLX vs. FCGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I (BSGLX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX).
BSGLX is managed by Baillie Gifford Funds. FCGSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013.
Performance
BSGLX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BSGLX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSGLX Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I | -19.24% | 16.26% | 24.92% | 36.43% | -46.11% | 2.37% | 101.90% | 33.40% | -1.42% | 24.21% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | -6.64% | 25.52% | 38.00% | 45.97% | -32.15% | 25.13% | 70.01% | 39.75% | -4.03% | 21.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSGLX achieves a -19.24% return, which is significantly lower than FCGSX's -6.64% return.
BSGLX
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -9.96%
- YTD
- -19.24%
- 6M
- -24.40%
- 1Y
- -0.45%
- 3Y*
- 10.41%
- 5Y*
- -2.06%
- 10Y*
- —
FCGSX
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -8.19%
- YTD
- -6.64%
- 6M
- -2.02%
- 1Y
- 33.82%
- 3Y*
- 27.05%
- 5Y*
- 14.28%
- 10Y*
- 21.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BSGLX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSGLX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BSGLX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank
BSGLX
FCGSX
BSGLX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I (BSGLX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSGLX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | 1.40 | -1.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.08 | 2.02 | -1.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.29 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 2.25 | -2.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | 10.23 | -10.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSGLX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 | 1.40 | -1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 0.61 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.87 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between BSGLX and FCGSX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BSGLX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison
BSGLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.22%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSGLX Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.85% | 5.17% | 8.40% | 0.15% | 10.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | 11.22% | 10.48% | 12.49% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 38.65% | 31.99% | 11.06% | 13.21% | 10.51% | 2.44% | 0.25% |
Drawdowns
BSGLX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSGLX drawdown since its inception was -56.23%, which is greater than FCGSX's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSGLX and FCGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSGLX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.23% | -38.77% | -17.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.69% | -13.10% | -12.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.21% | -38.77% | -17.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.69% | -10.42% | -15.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.83% | -7.05% | -10.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.62% | 2.88% | +5.74% |
Volatility
BSGLX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I (BSGLX) has a higher volatility of 7.55% compared to Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) at 6.66%. This indicates that BSGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BSGLX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.55% | 6.66% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.32% | 13.74% | +2.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.54% | 23.80% | +1.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.84% | 23.62% | +6.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.13% | 23.15% | +4.98% |