PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSGLX vs. AIEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BSGLX vs. AIEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I (BSGLX) and AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BSGLX vs. AIEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BSGLX
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I
-15.65%16.26%22.65%
AIEQ
AI Powered Equity ETF
-3.53%13.96%14.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSGLX achieves a -15.65% return, which is significantly lower than AIEQ's -3.53% return.


BSGLX

1D
4.45%
1M
-5.54%
YTD
-15.65%
6M
-20.86%
1Y
2.89%
3Y*
12.02%
5Y*
-1.71%
10Y*

AIEQ

1D
0.73%
1M
-4.56%
YTD
-3.53%
6M
-2.63%
1Y
17.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BSGLX vs. AIEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BSGLX and AIEQ have an expense ratio of 0.80%.


Return for Risk

BSGLX vs. AIEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSGLX
BSGLX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
BSGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
BSGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

AIEQ
AIEQ Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
AIEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
AIEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSGLX vs. AIEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I (BSGLX) and AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSGLXAIEQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.15

0.79

-0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.41

1.28

-0.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.20

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

1.21

-1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.29

5.89

-5.60

BSGLX vs. AIEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSGLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the AIEQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSGLX and AIEQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSGLXAIEQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

0.79

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.56

-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between BSGLX and AIEQ is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BSGLX vs. AIEQ - Dividend Comparison

BSGLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AIEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BSGLX
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.85%5.17%8.40%0.15%10.07%
AIEQ
AI Powered Equity ETF
0.45%0.43%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BSGLX vs. AIEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSGLX drawdown since its inception was -56.23%, which is greater than AIEQ's maximum drawdown of -24.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSGLX and AIEQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BSGLXAIEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.23%

-24.19%

-32.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.69%

-15.35%

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.38%

-5.85%

-16.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.83%

-3.50%

-14.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.74%

3.17%

+5.57%

Volatility

BSGLX vs. AIEQ - Volatility Comparison

Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I (BSGLX) has a higher volatility of 8.97% compared to AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) at 5.35%. This indicates that BSGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BSGLXAIEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.97%

5.35%

+3.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.87%

9.76%

+7.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.88%

21.59%

+4.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.89%

19.93%

+9.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.17%

19.93%

+8.24%