PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSGLX vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSGLX vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I (BSGLX) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSGLX achieves a -11.43% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's -8.34% return.


BSGLX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
-11.43%
6M
-12.39%
1Y
-6.00%
3Y*
12.21%
5Y*
-1.51%
10Y*

MSFT

1D
-4.17%
1M
6.71%
YTD
-8.34%
6M
-9.54%
1Y
-3.71%
3Y*
10.44%
5Y*
13.35%
10Y*
25.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSGLX vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSGLX
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I
-11.43%16.26%24.92%36.43%-46.11%2.37%101.90%33.40%-1.42%24.21%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-8.34%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%57.56%20.80%26.97%

Correlation

The correlation between BSGLX and MSFT is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2017

0.67

The correlation between BSGLX and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSGLX vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSGLX
BSGLX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BSGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BSGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSGLX vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I (BSGLX) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSGLXMSFTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.25

-0.15

-0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.21

-0.04

-0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.00

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

-0.10

-0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.45

-0.21

-0.24

BSGLX vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSGLX Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSGLX and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSGLXMSFTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

-0.15

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.50

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.75

-0.26

Drawdowns

BSGLX vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSGLX drawdown since its inception was -56.23%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSGLX and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSGLXMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.23%

-69.38%

+13.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.69%

-33.91%

+8.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.30%

-33.91%

+6.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.21%

-37.15%

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.50%

-18.07%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.83%

-21.78%

+3.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.15%

15.90%

-4.75%

Volatility

BSGLX vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I (BSGLX) is 3.68%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 9.31%. This indicates that BSGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSGLXMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

9.31%

-5.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.76%

22.14%

-6.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.57%

24.92%

-4.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.75%

26.59%

+3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.01%

27.03%

+0.98%

Dividends

BSGLX vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

BSGLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSGLX
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.85%5.17%8.40%0.15%10.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.81%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSGLX and MSFT have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSFT has higher volatility (9.31%) compared to BSGLX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSGLX dropped -56.23% vs MSFT's -69.38%.

MSFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSGLX and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer