BSGLX vs. MSFT
BSGLX (Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Baillie Gifford Funds, while MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, BSGLX returned -1.51%/yr vs 13.35%/yr for MSFT. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
BSGLX vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSGLX achieves a -11.43% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's -8.34% return.
BSGLX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- -11.43%
- 6M
- -12.39%
- 1Y
- -6.00%
- 3Y*
- 12.21%
- 5Y*
- -1.51%
- 10Y*
- —
MSFT
- 1D
- -4.17%
- 1M
- 6.71%
- YTD
- -8.34%
- 6M
- -9.54%
- 1Y
- -3.71%
- 3Y*
- 10.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.35%
- 10Y*
- 25.43%
BSGLX vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSGLX Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I | -11.43% | 16.26% | 24.92% | 36.43% | -46.11% | 2.37% | 101.90% | 33.40% | -1.42% | 24.21% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -8.34% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 57.56% | 20.80% | 26.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSGLX and MSFT is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2017 | 0.67 |
The correlation between BSGLX and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSGLX vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
BSGLX
MSFT
BSGLX vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I (BSGLX) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSGLX | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | -0.15 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | -0.04 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.00 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | -0.10 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.45 | -0.21 | -0.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSGLX | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 | -0.15 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.50 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.75 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
BSGLX vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSGLX drawdown since its inception was -56.23%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSGLX and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSGLX | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.23% | -69.38% | +13.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.69% | -33.91% | +8.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.30% | -33.91% | +6.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.21% | -37.15% | -19.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.50% | -18.07% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.83% | -21.78% | +3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.15% | 15.90% | -4.75% |
Volatility
BSGLX vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I (BSGLX) is 3.68%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 9.31%. This indicates that BSGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSGLX | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 9.31% | -5.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.76% | 22.14% | -6.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.57% | 24.92% | -4.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.75% | 26.59% | +3.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.01% | 27.03% | +0.98% |
Dividends
BSGLX vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
BSGLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSGLX Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.85% | 5.17% | 8.40% | 0.15% | 10.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.81% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSGLX and MSFT have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFT has higher volatility (9.31%) compared to BSGLX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSGLX dropped -56.23% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
MSFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSGLX and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer