PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BSGLX vs. FBGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


BSGLXFBGX
YTD Return4.58%9.52%
1Y Return28.07%58.60%
3Y Return (Ann)-8.92%6.32%
5Y Return (Ann)11.62%22.74%
Sharpe Ratio1.221.90
Daily Std Dev21.50%29.36%
Max Drawdown-56.63%-59.88%
Current Drawdown-33.38%-14.22%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between BSGLX and FBGX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

BSGLX vs. FBGX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BSGLX achieves a 4.58% return, which is significantly lower than FBGX's 9.52% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%250.00%300.00%350.00%400.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
132.67%
344.89%
BSGLX
FBGX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I

UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN

BSGLX vs. FBGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSGLX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGX's 1.29% expense ratio.


FBGX
UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN
Expense ratio chart for FBGX: current value at 1.29% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.29%
Expense ratio chart for BSGLX: current value at 0.80% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.80%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BSGLX vs. FBGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I (BSGLX) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSGLX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BSGLX, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.22
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BSGLX, currently valued at 1.74, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.001.74
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BSGLX, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.21
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BSGLX, currently valued at 0.53, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.53
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BSGLX, currently valued at 3.73, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.0060.003.73
FBGX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FBGX, currently valued at 1.90, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.90
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FBGX, currently valued at 2.56, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.002.56
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FBGX, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FBGX, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.18
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FBGX, currently valued at 8.89, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.0060.008.89

BSGLX vs. FBGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSGLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the FBGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of BSGLX and FBGX.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.22
1.90
BSGLX
FBGX

Dividends

BSGLX vs. FBGX - Dividend Comparison

Neither BSGLX nor FBGX has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019
BSGLX
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I
0.00%0.00%3.85%5.17%8.40%0.14%
FBGX
UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BSGLX vs. FBGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSGLX drawdown since its inception was -56.63%, smaller than the maximum FBGX drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSGLX and FBGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-33.38%
-14.22%
BSGLX
FBGX

Volatility

BSGLX vs. FBGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I (BSGLX) is 6.69%, while UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) has a volatility of 10.20%. This indicates that BSGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
6.69%
10.20%
BSGLX
FBGX