BSGLX vs. FBGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BSGLX (Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I) and FBGX (UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN) are both funds - BSGLX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Baillie Gifford Funds, while FBGX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%). A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSGLX charges 0.80%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for FBGX.

Performance

BSGLX vs. FBGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I (BSGLX) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BSGLX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.53%
• YTD: -11.43%
• 6M: -12.41%
• 1Y: -6.31%
• 3Y*: 12.21%
• 5Y*: -1.05%
• 10Y*: —

FBGX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSGLX vs. FBGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BSGLX Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I	-11.43%	16.26%	24.92%	36.43%	-46.11%	2.37%	101.90%	33.40%	-1.42%	24.21%
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN	0.00%	0.00%	35.73%	83.74%	-56.41%	57.04%	65.79%	75.84%	-16.58%	34.08%

Correlation

The correlation between BSGLX and FBGX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2017	0.72

The correlation between BSGLX and FBGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BSGLX vs. FBGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSGLX

BSGLX Risk / Return Rank: 2
BSGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BSGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BSGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BSGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BSGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSGLX vs. FBGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I (BSGLX) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSGLX	FBGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.30	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.27	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.24	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.54	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSGLX	FBGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BSGLX	FBGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.50%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.83%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.21%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BSGLX	FBGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.67%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.69%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.53%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.75%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.01%	—	—

BSGLX vs. FBGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSGLX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGX's 1.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSGLX vs. FBGX - Dividend Comparison

Neither BSGLX nor FBGX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BSGLX Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.85%	5.17%	8.40%	0.15%	10.07%
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSGLX and FBGX in my portfolio?

BSGLX and FBGX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.