BSCZ vs. XLG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BSCZ (Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSCZ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSCZ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

BSCZ vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCZ achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 7.57% return.

BSCZ

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 0.18%
• 6M: -0.02%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XLG

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: 4.22%
• YTD: 7.57%
• 6M: 7.32%
• 1Y: 28.54%
• 3Y*: 24.46%
• 5Y*: 16.24%
• 10Y*: 17.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCZ vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF	0.18%	5.67%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	7.57%	18.07%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCZ and XLG is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025	0.33

BSCZ vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSCZ	XLG
Healthcare	12.1%	7.0%
Communication Services	10.8%	17.1%
Technology	10.5%	43.9%
Financial Services	9.8%	9.6%
Energy	8.9%	2.7%
Consumer Cyclical	7.4%	11.3%
Industrials	7.3%	1.9%
Utilities	5.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	5.8%
Real Estate	3.5%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	0.6%

Return for Risk

BSCZ vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 56
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 61
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCZ vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSCZ	XLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.21	0.62	+0.59

Drawdowns

BSCZ vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCZ drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCZ and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSCZ	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.28%	-52.39%	+49.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.41%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.70%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.02%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.46%	-1.44%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.75%	-7.64%	+6.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.30%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BSCZ	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.19%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.80%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.98%	13.33%	-8.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.98%	18.68%	-13.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.98%	18.84%	-13.86%

BSCZ vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BSCZ vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

BSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, more than XLG's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF	4.09%	2.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.60%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSCZ and XLG in my portfolio?

BSCZ and XLG have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BSCZ or XLG?

On fees, BSCZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSCZ or XLG?

BSCZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSCZ or XLG?

BSCZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 0.60% for XLG.

What is the main difference between BSCZ and XLG?

BSCZ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while XLG is S&P 500. BSCZ tracks BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCZ and 0.20% for XLG.