PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCZ vs. OVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCZ vs. OVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCZ achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than OVT's 2.77% return.


BSCZ

1D
0.05%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.44%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OVT

1D
-0.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
2.77%
6M
3.48%
1Y
9.16%
3Y*
7.50%
5Y*
3.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCZ vs. OVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BSCZ and OVT is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

0.66

BSCZ vs. OVT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSCZ
OVT

Healthcare

12.1%
8.5%

Communication Services

10.8%
11.2%

Technology

10.5%
35.6%

Financial Services

9.8%
11.8%

Energy

8.9%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
10.1%

Industrials

7.3%
8.3%

Utilities

5.0%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
4.9%

Real Estate

3.5%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.8%

Healthcare

BSCZ
12.1%
OVT
8.5%

Communication Services

BSCZ
10.8%
OVT
11.2%

Technology

BSCZ
10.5%
OVT
35.6%

Financial Services

BSCZ
9.8%
OVT
11.8%

Energy

BSCZ
8.9%
OVT
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

BSCZ
7.4%
OVT
10.1%

Industrials

BSCZ
7.3%
OVT
8.3%

Utilities

BSCZ
5.0%
OVT
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

BSCZ
4.6%
OVT
4.9%

Real Estate

BSCZ
3.5%
OVT
1.9%

Basic Materials

BSCZ
1.7%
OVT
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCZ vs. OVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCZ

OVT
OVT Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
OVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
OVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCZ vs. OVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BSCZ vs. OVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCZOVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

0.69

+0.58

Drawdowns

BSCZ vs. OVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCZ drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum OVT drawdown of -13.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCZ and OVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCZOVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-13.59%

+10.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-0.25%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.74%

-3.39%

+2.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.45%

Volatility

BSCZ vs. OVT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCZOVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.99%

3.44%

+1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.99%

4.63%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.99%

4.54%

+0.45%

BSCZ vs. OVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than OVT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSCZ vs. OVT - Dividend Comparison

BSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, less than OVT's 8.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BSCZ
Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF
4.08%2.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OVT
Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF
8.16%7.21%6.15%5.11%4.12%4.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCZ and OVT have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BSCZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSCZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for OVT.

OVT has the higher dividend yield at 8.16%, compared with 4.08% for BSCZ.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Liquid Strategies. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCZ and 0.80% for OVT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCZ and OVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer