BSCZ vs. QCON

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BSCZ (Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. BSCZ is passively managed, while QCON is actively managed. BSCZ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.

Performance

BSCZ vs. QCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BSCZ

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 0.43%
• 6M: 0.44%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QCON

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCZ vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF	-0.05%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%

BSCZ vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSCZ	QCON
Healthcare	12.1%	-
Communication Services	10.8%	-
Technology	10.5%	-
Financial Services	9.8%	7.9%
Energy	8.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.4%	-
Industrials	7.3%	1.0%
Utilities	5.0%	1.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	-
Real Estate	3.5%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

BSCZ vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSCZ	QCON	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.27	—	—

Drawdowns

BSCZ vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCZ drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCZ and QCON.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSCZ	QCON	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.28%	0.00%	-3.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.22%	0.00%	-1.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.74%	0.00%	-0.74%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BSCZ	QCON	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.99%	0.00%	+4.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.99%	0.00%	+4.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.99%	0.00%	+4.99%

BSCZ vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSCZ vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison

BSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF	4.08%	2.18%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, BSCZ or QCON?

On fees, BSCZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSCZ or QCON?

BSCZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSCZ or QCON?

BSCZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.

What is the main difference between BSCZ and QCON?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCZ and 0.32% for QCON.