BSCZ vs. USL
BSCZ (Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF) and USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - BSCZ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index, while USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. BSCZ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for USL.
Performance
BSCZ vs. USL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCZ achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return.
BSCZ
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USL
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- 63.07%
- 6M
- 59.66%
- 1Y
- 57.86%
- 3Y*
- 18.42%
- 5Y*
- 17.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
BSCZ vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.18% | 5.67% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 63.07% | -7.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCZ and USL is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | -0.40 |
BSCZ vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSCZ
USL
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
BSCZ
USL
-
Communication Services
BSCZ
USL
-
Technology
BSCZ
USL
-
Financial Services
BSCZ
USL
Energy
BSCZ
USL
-
Consumer Cyclical
BSCZ
USL
-
Industrials
BSCZ
USL
-
Utilities
BSCZ
USL
-
Consumer Defensive
BSCZ
USL
-
Real Estate
BSCZ
USL
-
Basic Materials
BSCZ
USL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCZ vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank
BSCZ
USL
BSCZ vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCZ | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 0.01 | +1.20 |
Drawdowns
BSCZ vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCZ drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCZ and USL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCZ | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.28% | -89.06% | +85.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -38.16% | +36.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.75% | -61.46% | +60.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.27% | — |
Volatility
BSCZ vs. USL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCZ | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.98% | 28.54% | -23.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 30.08% | -25.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 32.35% | -27.37% |
BSCZ vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSCZ vs. USL - Dividend Comparison
BSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.09% | 2.18% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCZ and USL have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSCZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSCZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.
BSCZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 0.00% for USL.
BSCZ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while USL is Oil & Gas. BSCZ tracks BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCZ and 0.88% for USL.
Find the right allocation for BSCZ and USL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer