PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCZ vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCZ vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCZ achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.


BSCZ

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.18%
6M
-0.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCZ vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BSCZ
Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF
0.18%5.67%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.30%15.80%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCZ and QQQ is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

0.35

BSCZ vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSCZ
QQQ

Healthcare

12.1%
4.2%

Communication Services

10.8%
15.8%

Technology

10.5%
53.8%

Financial Services

9.8%
0.2%

Energy

8.9%
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
12.3%

Industrials

7.3%
2.8%

Utilities

5.0%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
7.7%

Real Estate

3.5%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.1%

Healthcare

BSCZ
12.1%
QQQ
4.2%

Communication Services

BSCZ
10.8%
QQQ
15.8%

Technology

BSCZ
10.5%
QQQ
53.8%

Financial Services

BSCZ
9.8%
QQQ
0.2%

Energy

BSCZ
8.9%
QQQ
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

BSCZ
7.4%
QQQ
12.3%

Industrials

BSCZ
7.3%
QQQ
2.8%

Utilities

BSCZ
5.0%
QQQ
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

BSCZ
4.6%
QQQ
7.7%

Real Estate

BSCZ
3.5%
QQQ
0.1%

Basic Materials

BSCZ
1.7%
QQQ
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCZ vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCZ

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCZ vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BSCZ vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCZQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.41

+0.80

Drawdowns

BSCZ vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCZ drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCZ and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCZQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-82.97%

+79.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-0.26%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.75%

-32.79%

+32.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

Volatility

BSCZ vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCZQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.98%

15.94%

-10.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.98%

22.38%

-17.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

22.29%

-17.31%

BSCZ vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSCZ vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

BSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCZ
Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF
4.09%2.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCZ and QQQ have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BSCZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSCZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.

BSCZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

BSCZ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. BSCZ tracks BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCZ and 0.18% for QQQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCZ and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer