BSCZ vs. QQQ
BSCZ (Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSCZ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSCZ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
BSCZ vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCZ achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.
BSCZ
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
BSCZ vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.18% | 5.67% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 15.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCZ and QQQ is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | 0.35 |
BSCZ vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSCZ
QQQ
Healthcare
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Healthcare
BSCZ
QQQ
Communication Services
BSCZ
QQQ
Technology
BSCZ
QQQ
Financial Services
BSCZ
QQQ
Energy
BSCZ
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
BSCZ
QQQ
Industrials
BSCZ
QQQ
Utilities
BSCZ
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
BSCZ
QQQ
Real Estate
BSCZ
QQQ
Basic Materials
BSCZ
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCZ vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
BSCZ
QQQ
BSCZ vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCZ | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 0.41 | +0.80 |
Drawdowns
BSCZ vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCZ drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCZ and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCZ | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.28% | -82.97% | +79.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -0.26% | -1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.75% | -32.79% | +32.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.11% | — |
Volatility
BSCZ vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCZ | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.98% | 15.94% | -10.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 22.38% | -17.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 22.29% | -17.31% |
BSCZ vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSCZ vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
BSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.09% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCZ and QQQ have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSCZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSCZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.
BSCZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
BSCZ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. BSCZ tracks BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCZ and 0.18% for QQQ.
Find the right allocation for BSCZ and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer