BSCX vs. XLG
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCX) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG).
BSCX and XLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BSCX is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Invesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2033 Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2023. XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 4, 2005. Both BSCX and XLG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BSCX vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BSCX vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCX Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF | -0.21% | 9.31% | 1.73% | 7.88% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | -7.18% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 8.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCX achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's -7.18% return.
BSCX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 0.57%
- 1Y
- 5.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLG
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -3.74%
- YTD
- -7.18%
- 6M
- -4.55%
- 1Y
- 19.62%
- 3Y*
- 21.92%
- 5Y*
- 13.96%
- 10Y*
- 15.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BSCX vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BSCX vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank
BSCX
XLG
BSCX vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCX) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCX | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 0.99 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.76 | 1.54 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.22 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 1.63 | +0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.50 | 5.71 | +1.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCX | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 0.99 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.20 | 0.59 | +0.61 |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCX and XLG is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BSCX vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
BSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, more than XLG's 0.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCX Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.90% | 4.82% | 5.00% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.70% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Drawdowns
BSCX vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCX drawdown since its inception was -5.13%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCX and XLG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCX | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.13% | -52.39% | +47.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.90% | -12.41% | +9.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | -8.93% | +7.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -7.69% | +6.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 3.54% | -2.69% |
Volatility
BSCX vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCX) is 1.98%, while Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that BSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BSCX | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.98% | 5.82% | -3.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.82% | 10.65% | -7.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.77% | 19.97% | -15.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.19% | 18.68% | -12.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.19% | 18.81% | -12.62% |