BSCS vs. LQDH
BSCS (Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF) and LQDH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. BSCS is passively managed, while LQDH is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSCS returned 1.28%/yr vs 5.22%/yr for LQDH. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSCS charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LQDH.
Performance
BSCS vs. LQDH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCS achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than LQDH's 2.45% return.
BSCS
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 4.13%
- 3Y*
- 5.59%
- 5Y*
- 1.28%
- 10Y*
- —
LQDH
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 2.45%
- 6M
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- 7.53%
- 3Y*
- 7.85%
- 5Y*
- 5.22%
- 10Y*
- 4.67%
BSCS vs. LQDH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCS Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.83% | 7.04% | 3.87% | 7.62% | -11.24% | -1.89% | 10.17% | 15.41% | -0.30% |
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 2.45% | 7.00% | 7.43% | 11.14% | -1.88% | 1.84% | 1.68% | 9.50% | -3.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCS and LQDH is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2018 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCS vs. LQDH — Risk / Return Rank
BSCS
LQDH
BSCS vs. LQDH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSCS | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.57 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.85 | 3.23 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.59 | 13.73 | +2.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSCS vs. LQDH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCS drawdown since its inception was -18.40%, smaller than the maximum LQDH drawdown of -24.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCS and LQDH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCS | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.40% | -24.63% | +6.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.08% | -2.34% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.14% | -4.86% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.63% | -7.08% | -10.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.11% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -1.67% | -2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.25% | 0.55% | -0.30% |
Volatility
BSCS vs. LQDH - Volatility Comparison
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) has a higher volatility of 0.51% compared to iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) at 0.43%. This indicates that BSCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCS | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.51% | 0.43% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.08% | 2.02% | -0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63% | 2.68% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.91% | 4.41% | +0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.22% | 6.43% | -0.21% |
BSCS vs. LQDH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than LQDH's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSCS vs. LQDH - Dividend Comparison
BSCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than LQDH's 5.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCS Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.46% | 4.46% | 4.54% | 3.90% | 2.72% | 2.14% | 2.50% | 3.04% | 1.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 5.94% | 6.06% | 7.57% | 7.69% | 3.73% | 1.65% | 2.22% | 3.09% | 5.08% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCS and LQDH have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSCS has higher volatility (0.51%) compared to LQDH (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCS dropped -18.40% vs LQDH's -24.63%.
On 5-year performance, LQDH leads with 5.22% vs 1.28% for BSCS. On fees, BSCS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LQDH has performed better with a 5.22% return vs 1.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSCS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LQDH.
LQDH has the higher dividend yield at 5.94%, compared with 4.46% for BSCS.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCS and 0.25% for LQDH.
LQDH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSCS and LQDH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer