PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCS vs. AGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCS vs. AGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCS achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly higher than AGG's -0.56% return.


BSCS

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.03%
6M
0.79%
YTD
1.16%
1Y
3.41%
3Y*
5.60%
5Y*
1.07%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.70%

AGG

1D
-0.26%
1M
-1.26%
6M
-0.81%
YTD
-0.56%
1Y
1.83%
3Y*
3.95%
5Y*
-0.40%
10Y*
1.37%
ALL TIME*
3.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$763.20M$778.44M$807.34M
$9.44M$10.96M$10.54M

BSCS vs. AGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BSCS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF
1.16%7.04%3.87%7.62%-11.24%-1.89%10.17%15.41%-0.30%
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
-0.56%7.19%1.31%5.65%-13.02%-1.77%7.48%8.46%1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCS and AGG is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2018

0.83

The correlation between BSCS and AGG shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCS vs. AGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BSCS
BSCS Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BSCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCS Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCS Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

AGG
AGG Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
AGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGG Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
AGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BSCS vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSCSAGGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.12

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

0.99

+2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.19

2.49

+13.70

BSCS vs. AGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCS Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the AGG Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCS and AGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSCS vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCS drawdown since its inception was -18.40%, roughly equal to the maximum AGG drawdown of -18.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCS and AGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCSAGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.40%

-18.43%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.08%

-2.76%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.84%

-4.98%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.25%

-17.82%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-2.94%

+2.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-2.70%

-1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

1.09%

-0.84%

Volatility

BSCS vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) is 0.46%, while iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) has a volatility of 1.03%. This indicates that BSCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCSAGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

1.03%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.14%

2.98%

-1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60%

3.78%

-2.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.89%

6.10%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.18%

5.41%

+0.77%

BSCS vs. AGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than AGG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSCS vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison

BSCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, more than AGG's 4.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
3.71%3.89%3.74%3.13%2.39%1.77%2.14%2.70%2.72%2.32%2.39%2.45%
BSCS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF
4.45%4.46%4.54%3.90%2.72%2.14%2.50%3.04%1.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCS and AGG have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGG has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to BSCS (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCS dropped -18.40% vs AGG's -18.43%.

On 5-year performance, BSCS leads with 1.07% vs -0.40% for AGG. On fees, AGG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BSCS has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BSCS has performed better with a 1.07% return vs -0.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for BSCS.

BSCS has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 3.71% for AGG.

BSCS is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while AGG is Total Bond Market. BSCS tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2028 TR Index, while AGG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCS and 0.03% for AGG.

BSCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCS and AGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer