LQDH vs. VRIG
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) and Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG).
LQDH and VRIG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LQDH is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on May 27, 2014. VRIG is an actively managed fund by Invesco. It was launched on Sep 20, 2016.
Performance
LQDH vs. VRIG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LQDH vs. VRIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 0.22% | 7.00% | 7.43% | 11.14% | -1.88% | 1.84% | 1.68% | 9.50% | -2.20% | 6.00% |
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 0.92% | 5.05% | 6.81% | 7.37% | 0.99% | 1.06% | 1.76% | 4.57% | 0.51% | 3.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQDH achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than VRIG's 0.92% return.
LQDH
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 6.79%
- 3Y*
- 7.74%
- 5Y*
- 4.75%
- 10Y*
- 4.56%
VRIG
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- 4.84%
- 3Y*
- 6.25%
- 5Y*
- 4.30%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LQDH vs. VRIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQDH has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than VRIG's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LQDH vs. VRIG — Risk / Return Rank
LQDH
VRIG
LQDH vs. VRIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) and Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LQDH | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.66 | 5.22 | -3.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.41 | 6.83 | -4.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 3.22 | -1.85 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 6.23 | -4.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.91 | 52.58 | -43.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LQDH | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 5.22 | -3.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | 3.35 | -2.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.89 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between LQDH and VRIG is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LQDH vs. VRIG - Dividend Comparison
LQDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, more than VRIG's 4.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 6.10% | 6.06% | 7.57% | 7.69% | 3.73% | 1.65% | 2.22% | 3.09% | 5.08% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.98% |
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 4.89% | 4.99% | 6.09% | 5.97% | 2.39% | 0.78% | 1.57% | 3.12% | 2.89% | 2.31% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LQDH vs. VRIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQDH drawdown since its inception was -24.63%, which is greater than VRIG's maximum drawdown of -13.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDH and VRIG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQDH | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.63% | -13.04% | -11.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.85% | -0.78% | -3.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.08% | -2.28% | -4.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | 0.00% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.70% | -0.27% | -1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.76% | 0.09% | +0.67% |
Volatility
LQDH vs. VRIG - Volatility Comparison
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) has a higher volatility of 1.54% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) at 0.18%. This indicates that LQDH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LQDH | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 0.18% | +1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.25% | 0.36% | +1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.11% | 0.93% | +3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.43% | 1.29% | +3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.45% | 3.83% | +2.62% |