BSCS vs. BSCR
BSCS (Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF) and BSCR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds from Invesco - BSCS tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2028 TR Index while BSCR tracks the NASDAQ Bulletshares® USD Corporate Bond 2027 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSCS returned 1.47%/yr vs 1.47%/yr for BSCR. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.10% expense ratio.
Performance
BSCS vs. BSCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCS achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than BSCR's 1.27% return.
BSCS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 5.47%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- —
BSCR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 4.56%
- 3Y*
- 5.18%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- —
BSCS vs. BSCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCS Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.81% | 7.04% | 3.87% | 7.62% | -11.24% | -1.89% | 10.17% | 15.41% | -0.40% |
BSCR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.27% | 5.77% | 4.52% | 6.41% | -9.56% | -1.72% | 9.68% | 14.88% | 0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCS and BSCR is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2018 | 0.89 |
The correlation between BSCS and BSCR shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BSCS vs. BSCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSCS
BSCR
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Financial Services
BSCS
BSCR
Technology
BSCS
BSCR
Healthcare
BSCS
BSCR
Consumer Cyclical
BSCS
BSCR
Industrials
BSCS
BSCR
Consumer Defensive
BSCS
BSCR
Utilities
BSCS
BSCR
Real Estate
BSCS
BSCR
Communication Services
BSCS
BSCR
Energy
BSCS
BSCR
Basic Materials
BSCS
BSCR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCS vs. BSCR — Risk / Return Rank
BSCS
BSCR
BSCS vs. BSCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCS | BSCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.75 | 4.26 | -1.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.60 | 7.98 | -3.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 2.11 | -0.53 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.17 | 11.03 | -6.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.91 | 46.87 | -28.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCS | BSCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.75 | 4.26 | -1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.36 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.59 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
BSCS vs. BSCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCS drawdown since its inception was -18.40%, which is greater than BSCR's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCS and BSCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCS | BSCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.40% | -17.26% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.08% | -0.42% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.14% | -2.41% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.63% | -14.87% | -2.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | 0.00% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.20% | -3.35% | -0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.25% | 0.10% | +0.15% |
Volatility
BSCS vs. BSCR - Volatility Comparison
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) has a higher volatility of 0.38% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) at 0.19%. This indicates that BSCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCS | BSCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.38% | 0.19% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.02% | 0.59% | +0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69% | 1.08% | +0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 4.09% | +0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.24% | 5.35% | +0.89% |
BSCS vs. BSCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BSCS and BSCR have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSCS vs. BSCR - Dividend Comparison
BSCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than BSCR's 4.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.29% | 4.26% | 4.27% | 3.74% | 2.65% | 2.12% | 2.46% | 3.11% | 3.35% | 0.78% |
BSCS Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.46% | 4.46% | 4.54% | 3.90% | 2.72% | 2.14% | 2.50% | 3.04% | 1.42% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCS and BSCR have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSCS has higher volatility (0.38%) compared to BSCR (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCS dropped -18.40% vs BSCR's -17.26%.
On 5-year performance, BSCR leads with 1.47% vs 1.47% for BSCS. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, BSCR has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BSCR has performed better with a 1.47% return vs 1.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSCS and BSCR have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.
BSCS has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 4.29% for BSCR.
BSCS tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2028 TR Index, while BSCR tracks NASDAQ Bulletshares® USD Corporate Bond 2027 Index.
BSCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.25 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSCS and BSCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer