PortfoliosLab logo
LQDH vs. LQDW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LQDH and LQDW is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LQDH vs. LQDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) and iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
22.01%
2.49%
LQDH
LQDW

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LQDH:

0.96

LQDW:

1.16

Sortino Ratio

LQDH:

1.39

LQDW:

1.63

Omega Ratio

LQDH:

1.21

LQDW:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

LQDH:

0.79

LQDW:

1.27

Martin Ratio

LQDH:

4.05

LQDW:

3.96

Ulcer Index

LQDH:

0.95%

LQDW:

1.44%

Daily Std Dev

LQDH:

4.01%

LQDW:

4.92%

Max Drawdown

LQDH:

-24.63%

LQDW:

-9.20%

Current Drawdown

LQDH:

-1.83%

LQDW:

-0.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQDH achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than LQDW's 3.04% return.


LQDH

YTD

-0.10%

1M

2.01%

6M

0.64%

1Y

3.87%

5Y*

6.38%

10Y*

3.56%

LQDW

YTD

3.04%

1M

1.99%

6M

3.26%

1Y

5.65%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LQDH vs. LQDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQDH has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LQDW's 0.34% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LQDH vs. LQDW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQDH is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQDH is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQDH is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQDH is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQDH is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQDH is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

LQDW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQDW is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQDW is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQDW is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQDW is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQDW is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQDW is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LQDH vs. LQDW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) and iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LQDH Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the LQDW Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDH and LQDW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.96
1.16
LQDH
LQDW

Dividends

LQDH vs. LQDW - Dividend Comparison

LQDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.05%, less than LQDW's 16.33% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LQDH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF
7.05%7.57%7.69%3.73%1.65%2.22%3.09%5.08%2.37%2.33%2.98%2.19%
LQDW
iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF
16.33%15.74%19.28%8.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LQDH vs. LQDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDH drawdown since its inception was -24.63%, which is greater than LQDW's maximum drawdown of -9.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDH and LQDW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-1.83%
-0.15%
LQDH
LQDW

Volatility

LQDH vs. LQDW - Volatility Comparison

iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) and iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW) have volatilities of 2.55% and 2.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2.55%
2.58%
LQDH
LQDW