PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCS vs. SPBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCS vs. SPBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) and SPDR Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF (SPBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCS achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than SPBO's 0.91% return.


BSCS

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.81%
6M
1.30%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
5.47%
5Y*
1.47%
10Y*

SPBO

1D
0.03%
1M
0.60%
YTD
0.91%
6M
0.88%
1Y
6.62%
3Y*
5.61%
5Y*
0.82%
10Y*
2.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCS vs. SPBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BSCS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF
0.81%7.04%3.87%7.62%-11.24%-1.89%10.17%15.41%-0.40%
SPBO
SPDR Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF
0.91%7.83%2.59%8.80%-15.68%-1.57%10.17%14.70%0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCS and SPBO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2018

0.84

The correlation between BSCS and SPBO shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCS vs. SPBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCS
BSCS Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BSCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCS Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

SPBO
SPBO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SPBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPBO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
SPBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPBO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCS vs. SPBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) and SPDR Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF (SPBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSCSSPBODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.75

1.53

+1.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.60

2.23

+2.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.27

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.17

2.22

+1.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.91

7.04

+10.86

BSCS vs. SPBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCS Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the SPBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCS and SPBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCSSPBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

1.53

+1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.11

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.47

+0.12

Drawdowns

BSCS vs. SPBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCS drawdown since its inception was -18.40%, smaller than the maximum SPBO drawdown of -22.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCS and SPBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCSSPBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.40%

-22.23%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.08%

-2.87%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.14%

-6.41%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.63%

-22.23%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.70%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-4.04%

-0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

0.91%

-0.66%

Volatility

BSCS vs. SPBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) is 0.38%, while SPDR Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF (SPBO) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that BSCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCSSPBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.38%

1.36%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.02%

3.23%

-2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69%

4.36%

-2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.92%

7.18%

-2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.24%

7.49%

-1.25%

BSCS vs. SPBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SPBO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSCS vs. SPBO - Dividend Comparison

BSCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than SPBO's 5.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF
4.46%4.46%4.54%3.90%2.72%2.14%2.50%3.04%1.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPBO
SPDR Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF
5.11%5.09%5.28%4.73%3.54%2.42%2.75%3.46%3.60%3.15%3.35%3.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCS and SPBO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPBO has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to BSCS (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCS dropped -18.40% vs SPBO's -22.23%.

On 5-year performance, BSCS leads with 1.47% vs 0.82% for SPBO. On fees, SPBO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BSCS has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BSCS has performed better with a 1.47% return vs 0.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPBO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for BSCS.

SPBO has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 4.46% for BSCS.

BSCS tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2028 TR Index, while SPBO tracks Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCS and 0.03% for SPBO.

BSCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCS and SPBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer