PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCS vs. BSCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCS vs. BSCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) and Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCS achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly higher than BSCT's 0.57% return.


BSCS

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.76%
6M
1.17%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
5.45%
5Y*
1.39%
10Y*

BSCT

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.57%
6M
0.81%
1Y
4.84%
3Y*
5.61%
5Y*
1.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCS vs. BSCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BSCS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF
0.76%7.04%3.87%7.62%-11.24%-1.89%10.17%1.65%
BSCT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF
0.57%7.51%3.45%8.61%-12.88%-2.13%10.83%1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCS and BSCT is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2019

0.93

The correlation between BSCS and BSCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

BSCS vs. BSCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSCS
BSCT

Financial Services

14.8%
12.6%

Technology

11.9%
12.6%

Healthcare

10.3%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
10.0%

Industrials

8.4%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
4.5%

Utilities

4.5%
4.3%

Real Estate

4.1%
3.1%

Communication Services

4.1%
6.8%

Energy

3.6%
5.3%

Basic Materials

1.4%
1.2%

Financial Services

BSCS
14.8%
BSCT
12.6%

Technology

BSCS
11.9%
BSCT
12.6%

Healthcare

BSCS
10.3%
BSCT
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BSCS
9.4%
BSCT
10.0%

Industrials

BSCS
8.4%
BSCT
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

BSCS
5.8%
BSCT
4.5%

Utilities

BSCS
4.5%
BSCT
4.3%

Real Estate

BSCS
4.1%
BSCT
3.1%

Communication Services

BSCS
4.1%
BSCT
6.8%

Energy

BSCS
3.6%
BSCT
5.3%

Basic Materials

BSCS
1.4%
BSCT
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCS vs. BSCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCS
BSCS Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BSCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCS Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

BSCT
BSCT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BSCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCT Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCT Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCS vs. BSCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) and Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSCSBSCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.75

2.11

+0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.60

3.27

+1.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.41

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

2.99

+1.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.35

11.10

+7.25

BSCS vs. BSCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCS Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the BSCT Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCS and BSCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCSBSCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

2.11

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.22

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.32

+0.27

Drawdowns

BSCS vs. BSCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCS drawdown since its inception was -18.40%, roughly equal to the maximum BSCT drawdown of -19.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCS and BSCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCSBSCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.40%

-19.14%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.08%

-1.63%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.14%

-4.21%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.63%

-19.14%

+1.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.53%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-5.37%

+1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

0.44%

-0.19%

Volatility

BSCS vs. BSCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) is 0.37%, while Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCT) has a volatility of 0.60%. This indicates that BSCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCSBSCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.37%

0.60%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.01%

1.60%

-0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68%

2.31%

-0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.92%

5.71%

-0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.24%

7.26%

-1.02%

BSCS vs. BSCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BSCS and BSCT have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSCS vs. BSCT - Dividend Comparison

BSCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than BSCT's 4.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BSCS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF
4.46%4.46%4.54%3.90%2.72%2.14%2.50%3.04%1.42%
BSCT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF
4.57%4.53%4.51%3.89%2.65%1.94%2.24%0.86%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCS and BSCT have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSCT has higher volatility (0.60%) compared to BSCS (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCS dropped -18.40% vs BSCT's -19.14%.

On 5-year performance, BSCS leads with 1.39% vs 1.25% for BSCT. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, BSCS has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BSCS has performed better with a 1.39% return vs 1.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSCS and BSCT have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

BSCT has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 4.46% for BSCS.

BSCS tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2028 TR Index, while BSCT tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2029 Index.

BSCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCS and BSCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer