PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCT vs. AGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCT vs. AGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCT) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCT achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly higher than AGG's 0.47% return.


BSCT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.09%
YTD
0.62%
6M
1.02%
1Y
4.89%
3Y*
5.63%
5Y*
1.35%
10Y*

AGG

1D
0.03%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.49%
1Y
5.29%
3Y*
4.02%
5Y*
0.23%
10Y*
1.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCT vs. AGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BSCT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF
0.62%7.51%3.45%8.61%-12.88%-2.13%10.83%1.72%
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.47%7.19%1.31%5.65%-13.02%-1.77%7.48%0.79%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCT and AGG is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2019

0.88

The correlation between BSCT and AGG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCT vs. AGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCT
BSCT Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BSCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCT Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCT Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

AGG
AGG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
AGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
AGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCT vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCT) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSCTAGGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.13

1.38

+0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.31

2.06

+1.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.25

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

1.81

+1.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.98

5.61

+5.37

BSCT vs. AGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the AGG Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCT and AGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCTAGGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

1.38

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.04

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.59

-0.27

Drawdowns

BSCT vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCT drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, roughly equal to the maximum AGG drawdown of -18.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCT and AGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCTAGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.14%

-18.43%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.63%

-2.76%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.21%

-6.11%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.14%

-17.82%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-1.93%

+1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.37%

-2.71%

-2.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.44%

0.89%

-0.45%

Volatility

BSCT vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCT) is 0.63%, while iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) has a volatility of 1.32%. This indicates that BSCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCTAGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

1.32%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.62%

2.76%

-1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31%

3.85%

-1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.71%

6.09%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.27%

5.41%

+1.86%

BSCT vs. AGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than AGG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSCT vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison

BSCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than AGG's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
3.98%3.89%3.74%3.13%2.39%1.77%2.14%2.70%2.72%2.32%2.39%2.45%
BSCT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF
4.57%4.53%4.51%3.89%2.65%1.94%2.24%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCT and AGG have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGG has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to BSCT (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCT dropped -19.14% vs AGG's -18.43%.

On 5-year performance, BSCT leads with 1.35% vs 0.23% for AGG. On fees, AGG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BSCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BSCT has performed better with a 1.35% return vs 0.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for BSCT.

BSCT has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 3.98% for AGG.

BSCT is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while AGG is Total Bond Market. BSCT tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2029 Index, while AGG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCT and 0.03% for AGG.

BSCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCT and AGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer