PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCT vs. BALT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BSCT vs. BALT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCT) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BSCT vs. BALT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BSCT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF
0.16%7.51%3.45%8.61%-12.88%-0.59%
BALT
Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF
-0.13%6.65%9.98%7.45%2.54%0.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCT achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly higher than BALT's -0.13% return.


BSCT

1D
0.32%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
0.16%
6M
1.41%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
1.51%
10Y*

BALT

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
-0.13%
6M
1.97%
1Y
6.64%
3Y*
7.11%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BSCT vs. BALT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BALT's 0.69% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BSCT vs. BALT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCT
BSCT Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
BSCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

BALT
BALT Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
BALT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
BALT Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCT vs. BALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCT) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSCTBALTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.74

1.49

+0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.44

2.29

+0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.43

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

1.91

+0.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.75

12.79

-1.04

BSCT vs. BALT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCT Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the BALT Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCT and BALT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCTBALTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

1.49

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

1.70

-1.39

Correlation

The correlation between BSCT and BALT is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BSCT vs. BALT - Dividend Comparison

BSCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, while BALT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
BSCT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF
4.58%4.53%4.51%3.89%2.65%1.94%2.24%0.86%
BALT
Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BSCT vs. BALT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCT drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, which is greater than BALT's maximum drawdown of -4.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCT and BALT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCTBALTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.14%

-4.89%

-14.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.93%

-3.48%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-1.05%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.49%

-0.35%

-5.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

0.52%

-0.06%

Volatility

BSCT vs. BALT - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCT) has a higher volatility of 1.08% compared to Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) at 0.61%. This indicates that BSCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BALT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BSCTBALTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

0.61%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.60%

1.84%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11%

4.48%

-1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.74%

3.36%

+2.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.35%

3.36%

+3.99%