PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCR vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCR vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCR achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 9.70% return.


BSCR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.27%
6M
1.69%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
1.41%
10Y*

RSP

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.77%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.18%
1Y
19.50%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCR vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
1.27%5.77%4.52%6.41%-9.56%-1.72%9.68%14.88%-2.63%0.81%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
9.70%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.66%28.91%-7.84%6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCR and RSP is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2017

0.16

The correlation between BSCR and RSP shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BSCR vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSCR
RSP

Financial Services

20.9%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%
9.9%

Healthcare

10.4%
11.0%

Technology

10.1%
19.6%

Industrials

6.6%
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
6.5%

Communication Services

4.0%
3.7%

Energy

3.9%
4.5%

Utilities

3.3%
6.1%

Real Estate

3.0%
6.0%

Basic Materials

0.9%
4.1%

Financial Services

BSCR
20.9%
RSP
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

BSCR
12.1%
RSP
9.9%

Healthcare

BSCR
10.4%
RSP
11.0%

Technology

BSCR
10.1%
RSP
19.6%

Industrials

BSCR
6.6%
RSP
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

BSCR
5.1%
RSP
6.5%

Communication Services

BSCR
4.0%
RSP
3.7%

Energy

BSCR
3.9%
RSP
4.5%

Utilities

BSCR
3.3%
RSP
6.1%

Real Estate

BSCR
3.0%
RSP
6.0%

Basic Materials

BSCR
0.9%
RSP
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCR vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCR
BSCR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BSCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCR vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSCRRSPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.31

1.70

+2.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

8.11

2.47

+5.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.14

1.30

+0.84

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

11.08

2.49

+8.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

46.99

9.48

+37.52

BSCR vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCR Sharpe Ratio is 4.31, which is higher than the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCR and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCRRSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.31

1.70

+2.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.52

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.57

+0.03

Drawdowns

BSCR vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCR drawdown since its inception was -17.26%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCR and RSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCRRSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.26%

-59.92%

+42.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.42%

-7.85%

+7.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.41%

-17.81%

+15.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.87%

-21.38%

+6.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.38%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.35%

-6.65%

+3.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.10%

2.06%

-1.96%

Volatility

BSCR vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) is 0.19%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a volatility of 2.56%. This indicates that BSCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCRRSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.19%

2.56%

-2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.59%

8.29%

-7.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08%

11.56%

-10.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.09%

16.18%

-12.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.35%

18.35%

-13.00%

BSCR vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCR has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSCR vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

BSCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than RSP's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
4.29%4.26%4.27%3.74%2.65%2.12%2.46%3.11%3.35%0.78%0.00%0.00%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.49%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCR and RSP have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSP has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to BSCR (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCR dropped -17.26% vs RSP's -59.92%.

On 5-year performance, RSP leads with 8.33% vs 1.41% for BSCR. On fees, BSCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCR has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RSP has performed better with a 8.33% return vs 1.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for RSP.

BSCR has the higher dividend yield at 4.29%, compared with 1.49% for RSP.

BSCR is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while RSP is S&P 500. BSCR tracks NASDAQ Bulletshares® USD Corporate Bond 2027 Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCR and 0.20% for RSP.

BSCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCR and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer