BRO vs. LNG
BRO (Brown & Brown, Inc.) and LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. BRO operates in Insurance Brokers (Financial Services), while LNG operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, BRO returned 13.27%/yr vs 21.91%/yr for LNG. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BRO vs. LNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRO achieves a -26.85% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 22.32% return. Over the past 10 years, BRO has underperformed LNG with an annualized return of 13.27%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively higher 21.91% annualized return.
BRO
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- YTD
- -26.85%
- 6M
- -24.91%
- 1Y
- -47.08%
- 3Y*
- -2.56%
- 5Y*
- 3.04%
- 10Y*
- 13.27%
LNG
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- 22.32%
- 6M
- 18.42%
- 1Y
- -1.71%
- 3Y*
- 18.32%
- 5Y*
- 22.98%
- 10Y*
- 21.91%
BRO vs. LNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRO Brown & Brown, Inc. | -26.85% | -21.37% | 44.32% | 25.73% | -18.39% | 49.31% | 21.06% | 44.67% | 8.30% | 16.15% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 22.32% | -8.70% | 27.18% | 15.02% | 49.30% | 69.48% | -1.70% | 3.18% | 9.94% | 29.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRO and LNG is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 1997 | 0.19 |
Fundamentals
BRO:
$4.76
LNG:
$6.80
BRO:
12.18
LNG:
34.79
BRO:
0.89
LNG:
0.19
BRO:
2.18
LNG:
2.53
BRO:
$6.43B
LNG:
$20.28B
BRO:
$3.82B
LNG:
$5.52B
BRO:
$1.51B
LNG:
$5.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRO vs. LNG — Risk / Return Rank
BRO
LNG
BRO vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BRO | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.69 | 1.01 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | -0.07 | -0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.59 | -0.15 | -1.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRO | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.66 | -0.06 | -1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.76 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.68 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.16 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
BRO vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRO drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRO and LNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRO | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.85% | -97.84% | +41.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.55% | -24.09% | -26.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.85% | -24.87% | -30.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.85% | -24.87% | -30.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.85% | -57.53% | +1.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.91% | -20.12% | -32.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.52% | -43.16% | +29.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.57% | 11.67% | +17.90% |
Volatility
BRO vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison
Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) has a higher volatility of 9.52% compared to Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) at 7.91%. This indicates that BRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRO | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.52% | 7.91% | +1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.90% | 21.87% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.53% | 27.75% | +0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.81% | 30.28% | -5.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.69% | 32.59% | -8.90% |
Dividends
BRO vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison
BRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, more than LNG's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRO Brown & Brown, Inc. | 1.11% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.74% | 0.54% | 0.73% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.08% | 1.12% | 1.41% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.92% | 1.06% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BRO vs. LNG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brown & Brown, Inc. and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BRO vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison
BRO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brown & Brown, Inc. reported a gross profit of 994.00M and revenue of 1.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.3%.
LNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BRO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brown & Brown, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
LNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.49B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -59.4%.
BRO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brown & Brown, Inc. reported a net income of 426.00M and revenue of 1.90B, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.
LNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -3.50B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of -59.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BRO and LNG have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRO has higher volatility (9.52%) compared to LNG (7.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRO dropped -55.85% vs LNG's -97.84%.
LNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.06 vs -1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRO and LNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer