BRKC vs. XOMO

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

BRKC (YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF) and XOMO (YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BRKC returned -1.47% vs 17.42% for XOMO. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BRKC charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for XOMO.

Performance

BRKC vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF (BRKC) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRKC achieves a -1.60% return, which is significantly lower than XOMO's 7.88% return.

BRKC

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 1.00%
• YTD: -1.60%
• 6M: -1.32%
• 1Y: -1.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XOMO

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -6.72%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 6M: 8.87%
• 1Y: 17.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRKC vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BRKC YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF	-1.60%	0.76%
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF	7.88%	12.61%

Correlation

The correlation between BRKC and XOMO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	0.03

Return for Risk

BRKC vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRKC

BRKC Risk / Return Rank: 8
BRKC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
BRKC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
BRKC Omega Ratio Rank: 7
BRKC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
BRKC Martin Ratio Rank: 7

XOMO

XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 24
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 25
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRKC vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF (BRKC) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BRKC	XOMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.12	0.86	-0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.08	1.23	-1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.16	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	1.01	-1.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.40	2.98	-3.38

BRKC vs. XOMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRKC Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the XOMO Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRKC and XOMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BRKC vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRKC drawdown since its inception was -7.59%, smaller than the maximum XOMO drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRKC and XOMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRKC	XOMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.59%	-18.90%	+11.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.59%	-17.25%	+9.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.58%	-17.09%	+13.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.15%	-7.34%	+4.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.69%	5.86%	-2.17%

Volatility

BRKC vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF (BRKC) is 2.55%, while YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) has a volatility of 7.55%. This indicates that BRKC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BRKC	XOMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.55%	7.55%	-5.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.67%	17.54%	-7.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.57%	20.41%	-7.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.46%	19.15%	-6.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.46%	19.15%	-6.69%

BRKC vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRKC has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

BRKC vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison

BRKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.49%, less than XOMO's 39.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BRKC YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF	21.49%	10.81%	0.00%	0.00%
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF	39.13%	31.64%	26.94%	5.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRKC and XOMO in my portfolio?

BRKC and XOMO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BRKC or XOMO?

XOMO has higher volatility (7.55%) compared to BRKC (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRKC dropped -7.59% vs XOMO's -18.90%.

Which ETF is better, BRKC or XOMO?

On 1-year performance, XOMO leads with 17.42% vs -1.47% for BRKC. On fees, BRKC is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, BRKC has been the lower-risk option at 2.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BRKC or XOMO?

Over the 1-year period, XOMO has performed better with a 17.42% return vs -1.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BRKC or XOMO?

BRKC is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BRKC or XOMO?

XOMO has the higher dividend yield at 39.13%, compared with 21.49% for BRKC.

What is the main difference between BRKC and XOMO?

Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BRKC and 1.01% for XOMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XOMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.