BRKC vs. XOMO
BRKC (YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF) and XOMO (YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BRKC charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for XOMO.
Performance
BRKC vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRKC achieves a -3.15% return, which is significantly lower than XOMO's 16.83% return.
BRKC
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- -3.15%
- 6M
- -3.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XOMO
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- 16.83%
- 6M
- 19.65%
- 1Y
- 31.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRKC vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BRKC YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF | -3.15% | 0.93% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 16.83% | 13.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRKC and XOMO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRKC vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank
BRKC
XOMO
BRKC vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF (BRKC) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRKC | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.18 | 0.38 | -0.56 |
Drawdowns
BRKC vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRKC drawdown since its inception was -7.59%, smaller than the maximum XOMO drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRKC and XOMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRKC | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.59% | -18.90% | +11.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.10% | -10.21% | +5.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -7.22% | +4.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.92% | — |
Volatility
BRKC vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRKC | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.67% | 20.05% | -7.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.67% | 18.93% | -6.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.67% | 18.93% | -6.26% |
BRKC vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRKC has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRKC vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison
BRKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.53%, less than XOMO's 35.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BRKC YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF | 20.53% | 10.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 35.68% | 31.64% | 26.94% | 5.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRKC and XOMO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRKC is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRKC is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.
XOMO has the higher dividend yield at 35.68%, compared with 20.53% for BRKC.
Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BRKC and 1.01% for XOMO.
Find the right allocation for BRKC and XOMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer