BRKC vs. FEAT
BRKC (YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF) and FEAT (YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. BRKC is actively managed, while FEAT is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. BRKC charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for FEAT.
Performance
BRKC vs. FEAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRKC achieves a -3.65% return, which is significantly higher than FEAT's -6.90% return.
BRKC
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- -3.65%
- 6M
- -4.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEAT
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- -6.90%
- 6M
- -9.68%
- 1Y
- -8.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRKC vs. FEAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BRKC YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF | -3.65% | 0.93% |
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF | -6.90% | -1.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRKC and FEAT is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRKC vs. FEAT — Risk / Return Rank
BRKC
FEAT
BRKC vs. FEAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF (BRKC) and YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRKC | FEAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.22 | -0.45 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
BRKC vs. FEAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRKC drawdown since its inception was -7.59%, smaller than the maximum FEAT drawdown of -31.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRKC and FEAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRKC | FEAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.59% | -31.68% | +24.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -31.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.59% | -20.14% | +14.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -13.20% | +10.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.65% | — |
Volatility
BRKC vs. FEAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRKC | FEAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.90% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.68% | 27.94% | -15.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.68% | 30.33% | -17.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.68% | 30.33% | -17.65% |
BRKC vs. FEAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRKC has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than FEAT's 1.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRKC vs. FEAT - Dividend Comparison
BRKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.15%, less than FEAT's 89.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BRKC YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF | 20.15% | 10.81% |
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF | 89.83% | 76.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRKC and FEAT have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRKC is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRKC is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for FEAT.
FEAT has the higher dividend yield at 89.83%, compared with 20.15% for BRKC.
Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BRKC and 1.28% for FEAT.
Find the right allocation for BRKC and FEAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer