BRF vs. TMFC
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC).
BRF and TMFC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BRF is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Brazil Small-Cap Index. It was launched on May 12, 2009. TMFC is a passively managed fund by Motley Fool that tracks the performance of the Motley Fool 100 Index. It was launched on Jan 29, 2018. Both BRF and TMFC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BRF or TMFC.
Correlation
The correlation between BRF and TMFC is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BRF vs. TMFC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BRF:
-0.43
TMFC:
0.80
BRF:
-0.43
TMFC:
1.23
BRF:
0.95
TMFC:
1.18
BRF:
-0.19
TMFC:
0.89
BRF:
-0.84
TMFC:
3.18
BRF:
15.08%
TMFC:
5.60%
BRF:
29.13%
TMFC:
22.32%
BRF:
-81.72%
TMFC:
-33.06%
BRF:
-60.37%
TMFC:
-7.99%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRF achieves a 21.68% return, which is significantly higher than TMFC's -4.56% return.
BRF
21.68%
12.53%
-1.89%
-12.03%
4.12%
0.52%
TMFC
-4.56%
13.85%
-1.69%
16.46%
17.82%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BRF vs. TMFC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TMFC's 0.50% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BRF vs. TMFC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BRF
TMFC
BRF vs. TMFC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BRF vs. TMFC - Dividend Comparison
BRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than TMFC's 0.42% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRF VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF | 3.35% | 4.07% | 5.01% | 4.13% | 2.97% | 1.66% | 2.54% | 2.89% | 4.53% | 4.25% | 3.84% | 4.23% |
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF | 0.42% | 0.40% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BRF vs. TMFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRF drawdown since its inception was -81.72%, which is greater than TMFC's maximum drawdown of -33.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRF and TMFC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BRF vs. TMFC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) is 8.74%, while Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) has a volatility of 12.49%. This indicates that BRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.