PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRF vs. DAPP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRF vs. DAPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) and VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRF achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly lower than DAPP's 6.65% return.


BRF

1D
-0.43%
1M
-0.31%
6M
-12.16%
YTD
1.34%
1Y
20.04%
3Y*
-0.14%
5Y*
-2.02%
10Y*
3.54%
ALL TIME*
1.74%

DAPP

1D
-3.40%
1M
-4.60%
6M
-2.22%
YTD
6.65%
1Y
9.98%
3Y*
30.75%
5Y*
-3.48%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-11.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$47.50K$48.62K$103.93K
$5.30M$5.85M$16.14M

BRF vs. DAPP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BRF
VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF
1.34%54.17%-35.02%37.21%-14.38%-15.17%
DAPP
VanEck Digital Transformation ETF
6.65%15.03%44.87%285.02%-85.60%-45.88%

Correlation

The correlation between BRF and DAPP is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2021

0.32

BRF vs. DAPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BRF
DAPP

Consumer Cyclical

16.3%
2.8%

Real Estate

15.1%

-

Basic Materials

13.7%

-

Industrials

12.6%

-

Utilities

9.6%

-

Financial Services

9.2%
61.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.8%

-

Healthcare

6.2%

-

Energy

4.9%

-

Technology

3.5%
35.4%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

BRF
16.3%
DAPP
2.8%

Real Estate

BRF
15.1%
DAPP

-

Basic Materials

BRF
13.7%
DAPP

-

Industrials

BRF
12.6%
DAPP

-

Utilities

BRF
9.6%
DAPP

-

Financial Services

BRF
9.2%
DAPP
61.8%

Consumer Defensive

BRF
8.8%
DAPP

-

Healthcare

BRF
6.2%
DAPP

-

Energy

BRF
4.9%
DAPP

-

Technology

BRF
3.5%
DAPP
35.4%

Communication Services

BRF

-

DAPP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRF vs. DAPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BRF
BRF Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
BRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRF Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRF Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

DAPP
DAPP Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
DAPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAPP Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
DAPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAPP Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BRF vs. DAPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) and VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRFDAPPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.05

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

0.02

+1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.45

0.03

+2.42

BRF vs. DAPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRF Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is higher than the DAPP Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRF and DAPP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRF vs. DAPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRF drawdown since its inception was -82.26%, smaller than the maximum DAPP drawdown of -92.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRF and DAPP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRFDAPPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.26%

-92.61%

+10.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.51%

-48.21%

+27.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.89%

-58.88%

+21.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.02%

-91.90%

+48.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.60%

-46.67%

-3.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.77%

-60.79%

+15.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.97%

26.69%

-17.72%

Volatility

BRF vs. DAPP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) is 7.18%, while VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) has a volatility of 21.95%. This indicates that BRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRFDAPPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.18%

21.95%

-14.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.54%

47.95%

-25.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.04%

64.80%

-35.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.50%

73.12%

-41.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.82%

72.72%

-38.90%

BRF vs. DAPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DAPP's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRF vs. DAPP - Dividend Comparison

BRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, while DAPP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRF
VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF
5.47%5.54%4.08%5.02%4.13%2.96%1.66%2.54%2.89%4.53%4.25%3.84%
DAPP
VanEck Digital Transformation ETF
0.00%0.00%4.04%0.00%0.00%10.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRF and DAPP have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DAPP has higher volatility (21.95%) compared to BRF (7.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRF dropped -82.26% vs DAPP's -92.61%.

On 5-year performance, BRF leads with -2.02% vs -3.48% for DAPP. On fees, DAPP is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, BRF has been the lower-risk option at 7.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BRF has performed better with a -2.02% return vs -3.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DAPP is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BRF.

BRF has the higher dividend yield at 5.47%, compared with 0.00% for DAPP.

BRF is categorized as Latin America Equities, while DAPP is Blockchain. BRF tracks MVIS Brazil Small-Cap Index, while DAPP tracks MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BRF and 0.52% for DAPP.

BRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRF and DAPP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer