BRCE vs. FNDB
BRCE (MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF) and FNDB (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BRCE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by MFS, while FNDB is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index. BRCE is actively managed, while FNDB is passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BRCE charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDB.
Performance
BRCE vs. FNDB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRCE achieves a 14.62% return, which is significantly lower than FNDB's 16.45% return.
BRCE
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 3.15%
- 6M
- 11.69%
- YTD
- 14.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDB
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 12.55%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 1Y
- 28.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.45%
- 5Y*
- 13.08%
- 10Y*
- 13.84%
BRCE vs. FNDB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BRCE MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF | 14.62% | 2.04% |
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 16.45% | 2.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRCE and FNDB is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRCE vs. FNDB — Risk / Return Rank
BRCE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FNDB
BRCE vs. FNDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF (BRCE) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRCE | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.47 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.37 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.64 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRCE vs. FNDB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRCE drawdown since its inception was -8.77%, smaller than the maximum FNDB drawdown of -38.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRCE and FNDB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRCE | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.77% | -38.17% | +29.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -3.64% | +2.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.66% | — |
Volatility
BRCE vs. FNDB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRCE | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.35% | 10.82% | +3.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.35% | 15.30% | -0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.35% | 17.42% | -3.07% |
BRCE vs. FNDB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRCE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDB's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BRCE vs. FNDB - Dividend Comparison
BRCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than FNDB's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCE MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF | 0.51% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 1.44% | 1.62% | 1.74% | 1.80% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.15% | 2.23% | 2.41% | 1.91% | 2.06% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRCE and FNDB have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRCE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRCE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDB.
FNDB has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.51% for BRCE.
BRCE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDB is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: MFS and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BRCE and 0.25% for FNDB.
Find the right allocation for BRCE and FNDB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer