BRCE vs. VTI
BRCE (MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. BRCE is actively managed, while VTI is passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BRCE charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
BRCE vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRCE achieves a 10.51% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 8.82% return.
BRCE
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 10.51%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTI
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- 8.82%
- 6M
- 7.71%
- 1Y
- 24.22%
- 3Y*
- 20.62%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
BRCE vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BRCE MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF | 10.51% | 2.04% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 8.82% | 1.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRCE and VTI is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2025 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRCE vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
BRCE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VTI
BRCE vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF (BRCE) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRCE | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.73 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.14 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRCE vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRCE drawdown since its inception was -8.77%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRCE and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRCE | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.77% | -55.45% | +46.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.20% | -2.85% | +0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -8.01% | +6.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.00% | — |
Volatility
BRCE vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRCE | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.63% | 12.83% | +1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 17.51% | -2.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 18.32% | -3.69% |
BRCE vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRCE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BRCE vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
BRCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than VTI's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCE MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF | 0.34% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.04% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, BRCE and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for BRCE.
VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.34% for BRCE.
They also come from different issuers: MFS and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BRCE and 0.03% for VTI.
Find the right allocation for BRCE and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer