PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BPLEX vs. CLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BPLEX vs. CLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund (BPLEX) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPLEX achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 25.79% return. Over the past 10 years, BPLEX has underperformed CLS with an annualized return of 13.44%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively higher 42.61% annualized return.


BPLEX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.17%
YTD
11.10%
6M
14.03%
1Y
29.48%
3Y*
35.96%
5Y*
24.30%
10Y*
13.44%

CLS

1D
-3.79%
1M
-0.98%
YTD
25.79%
6M
8.72%
1Y
203.19%
3Y*
205.59%
5Y*
113.26%
10Y*
42.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPLEX vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BPLEX
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund
11.10%27.87%56.97%14.93%6.95%31.73%-5.82%8.97%-15.70%2.54%
CLS
Celestica Inc.
25.79%220.27%215.23%159.80%1.26%37.92%-2.42%-5.70%-16.32%-11.56%

Correlation

The correlation between BPLEX and CLS is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 1998

0.23

The correlation between BPLEX and CLS shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BPLEX vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPLEX
BPLEX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BPLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BPLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

CLS
CLS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPLEX vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund (BPLEX) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BPLEXCLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.37

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.66

7.00

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.36

17.31

+3.04

BPLEX vs. CLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPLEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is comparable to the CLS Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPLEX and CLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BPLEXCLSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87

2.82

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

1.98

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.86

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.27

+0.28

Drawdowns

BPLEX vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPLEX drawdown since its inception was -43.47%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPLEX and CLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BPLEXCLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.47%

-96.93%

+53.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.23%

-29.24%

+24.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.78%

-53.96%

+25.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.78%

-53.96%

+25.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.65%

-80.60%

+42.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-21.28%

+20.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.61%

-73.34%

+66.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

11.79%

-10.34%

Volatility

BPLEX vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund (BPLEX) is 3.82%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 26.77%. This indicates that BPLEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BPLEXCLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

26.77%

-22.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.26%

55.22%

-46.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.34%

72.51%

-62.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.92%

57.65%

-19.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.30%

49.94%

-20.64%

Dividends

BPLEX vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison

BPLEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.85%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPLEX
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund
9.85%10.94%58.72%28.35%15.19%5.11%44.84%11.33%9.69%0.83%0.00%9.91%
CLS
Celestica Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BPLEX and CLS have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLS has higher volatility (26.77%) compared to BPLEX (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPLEX dropped -43.47% vs CLS's -96.93%.

BPLEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BPLEX and CLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer