BPH vs. ASMH

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) and ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian, while ASMH is a Technology Equities fund tracking the ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. BPH is actively managed, while ASMH is passively managed. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 0.19% expense ratio.

Performance

BPH vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BPH

• 1D: -2.84%
• 1M: 9.16%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

ASMH

• 1D: -1.83%
• 1M: -8.02%
• 6M: 29.69%
• YTD: 61.20%
• 1Y: 147.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 108.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	$129.75K	$234.38K	$301.43K
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	$42.73K	$46.69K	$50.13K

BPH vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	-3.22%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	3.98%

Correlation

The correlation between BPH and ASMH is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	-0.02

Return for Risk

BPH vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BPH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASMH

ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 94
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 90
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BPH vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BPH	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.41	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.72	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.46	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	6.91	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	24.31	—

Drawdowns

BPH vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPH drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum ASMH drawdown of -21.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPH and ASMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	BPH	ASMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.58%	-21.52%	+5.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-21.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.41%	-15.85%	+7.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.61%	-4.85%	-0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.10%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BPH	ASMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.96%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	34.86%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.27%	43.67%	-13.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.27%	41.62%	-11.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.27%	41.62%	-11.35%

BPH vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BPH and ASMH have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BPH vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

BPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than ASMH's 1.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.90%	0.19%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.52%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BPH and ASMH in my portfolio?

BPH and ASMH have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BPH or ASMH?

Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BPH or ASMH?

BPH and ASMH have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BPH or ASMH?

ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.52% for BPH.

What is the main difference between BPH and ASMH?

BPH is categorized as Energy Equities, while ASMH is Technology Equities.